ZIONISTS TRY TO BAN JESUS

Gospels Accused of Antisemiticism

Jesus desecrated in over 1000 incidents of attacks on images of Jesus by Israelis in the last five years; recent desecrations were captured in Lebanon.

My sister has worked in Hollywood for over thirty years at a senior level. Although Hollywood is too diffuse an entity to be run by some sinister cabal of Zionists, as some allege, there has been a tacit understanding within mainstream media that is in one way or another beholden to Zionists that what Jesus preached is never given too much oxygen. Mel Gibson’s ‘Passion of the Christ’ was the litmus test. Predictably, the meticulously accurate recreation of The Passion was rigorously suppressed, not being distributed by any major chains of movie theatres, nor video companies. Thus, right under our noses, there has been operating a de facto muzzling of the message of Jesus; and simultaneously of any questioning of the ahistorical, derivative and forged character of the Old Testament and Torah.

The teachings of Jesus, and indeed any informed reading of the scriptures, are substantively inconvenient to Zionist narratives. Even if one knew nothing of the Apartheid, of the genocidal massacres, of the ghettoizaion, of the land theft, of the neo-fascism, of the collaboration in Mussolini’s genocides against the Libyans and Abyssinian, of the use of chemical and illegal weapons, of the systemic racism, of industrialisation of torture and sexual abuse endemic within Revisionist Zionism, the scriptures alone, if read rigorously, along with their increasing policing by Zionism, are sufficient in themselves to frame Zionism as a proscribed criminality, and thus comprise potential poison to the Zionist narrative if not mitigated.

The Torah scriptures are profiled as complex, so their meaning can be controlled by gatekeepers. But, notwithstanding, the Torah is among the simplest books to interpret ever written. Indeed, it is thematically so simple, it can be summed up in a single sentence. Putatively divine laws and rituals are repeatedly ignored and broken by Israelites, and the consequences of breaking these putatively divine laws is negative. In short, the Torah was, as Nietzche understood, a form of societal control, confected by an elite class, hypostatised by bogus supernatural forces, an instrument of mind control, internalised subservience inflicted on the masses, precisely as organised Christianity would in turn morph into.

As Jesus’s message unequivocally implies the dismantling of the apparatus of oppression that is the Torah, posing an existential threat to Judaism, every effort was made by the Sadducees and Pharisees and Talmudic scholars, over two millenia, to discredit Jesus as a heretic, a conman, a sorcerer, a criminal, a damned soul boiling for all eternity in faeces. The most recent attempt, in arguably the longest smear campaign in history, has been to sideline Jesus, render Jesus an irrelevance, by disseminating and encouraging Christian Zionism.

But as the Torah is itself a forgery, based on earlier Egyptian, Greek and Mesopotamian sources, fabricated by scribes in the second century BCE onwards, any authority located within the Torah for Christian Zionism is a priori bogus. No engagement with its daftness is required of any reasonable human being. Indeed, even the purporpedly Zionist propagandistic lines in Genesis 12 are addressed to Abraham and his seed, a fluid and nebulous group, if ever there was one, and not at any point specific to Judeans. Thus, even on its own terms, the Christian Zionist legitimation of dispensationalism can only ever amount to risible nonsense.

Let us look at what the scriptures actually say-

The meaning could not be clearer. The Judeans have broken their Covenant, which was an invention of post-explusion scribes in any event, so whether they break a manipulative fiction, or not, is neither here nor there. (Exodus 35: 5; Isiah 30: 7.) Numerous references evince the (fictional) Covenant has been broken.

See below-

Covenant broken

Covenant broken

Jesus is most accurately understood in the original Aramaic Gospels as anti-Judean, rather than a Jew hater. Frequently, references to “Jews” in the Tanukh and the Gospels elide with references to “Judeans.” For example, Nehemiah 2:16 is typical of this elision. Additionally, note how there is a specific reference to Judea in 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 and similar passages in the original Aramaic.

“Jews” typically used in metonymies or synedoches for “Judeans”

Judeans divinely damned

The substantive condemnation of the Judeans by Jesus is not that they are Jews, but rather the opposite, that they are no longer Jews. Jesus posits the Judeans have fallen away from Mosaic Judaism and have become a false people, hypocrites, actors.

The principal condemnation of the Judeans is that they have fallen away from the Mosaic origins of Judaism (in reality the Mosaic laws were a replication of the “Egyptian common sins”), predicated upon their being “false Jews”, in the sense that they are Edomites, Herodians, Moabites and other converted cohorts under the Hasmoneans, who have fallen into degeneracy and away from core Judaism.

This specifically ethnic complaint is absent from all versions of the Gospels after the early Aramaic Gospels. It has to be erased, to legitimate the Torah’s preconditions for the Messiah. If the Judeans are no longer the line of David, then Mary cannot be of the right blood to fulfil the prophecy, such that a significant objection, a race objection, is partially removed from the record.

The principal complaints against the Judeans in the Gospels are as follows-

Thematic complaints against the Judeans

The recurring reference to the Israelites breaking the Covenant, implying that a new order is imminent

Fierce condemnations of Judeans

Condemnation of Judeans

This is by no means a complete schedule of the contempt that Jesus and his disciples have for the Judeans.

While Christian Zionists point to conflicting sections where the Judeans are praised, tellingly these are not present, or not worded as later recorded in non Aramaic versions.

These questionable passages include the following

Apparent conflicting praise for the Judeans

Why were these passages, on which Christian Zionists have constructed an entire anti-Gospel cult, omitted or distinct in the Aramaic? Again, the answer lies in the acrobatics required to remain faithful to Jesus’s condemnation of the Judeans, while simultaneously ensuring that the status of Mary and Jesus accords with Torah prophecy.

In summary, Christian Zionism is a cheap seats cult based on false and fake sources and a highly selective, cherry picking interpretation of the scriptures. It has expanded to such a perilous degree, not through any theological merit, as it has none whatsoever, but through relentless funding and enabling by Israeli and US Ashkenazi Zionists, who understand its strategic value only too well in the preservation of their entitlement.

Thank you as always for reading

Salaam,

Antoun

copyright Antoun Ananias

Now available, Ramsey Hanhan, ‘Palestine Bleeds for You’