Why MoonSale Launchpad’s Security Score Is the Best Thing That Happened to IDO Investing (And Why Other Launchpads Are Terrified)

moonsale security score

Last week, I published a deep dive on why traditional launchpads are architecturally broken from our official blog posts.

The response was overwhelming. Hundreds of messages. One theme kept repeating:

“Okay, so MoonSale prevents rug pulls by code. But how do I actually know which projects are safe before I invest my money?”

Great question.

That’s where MoonSale’s Security Score system comes in.

And honestly? It’s so good that I’m shocked no other launchpad has copied it yet.

The Problem: How Do You Spot a Scam?

Traditional launchpad “vetting” looks like this:

• A team submits their project
• A human reviewer looks at it for 10 minutes
• That reviewer (who has financial incentives) approves or rejects it
• The launchpad publishes it
• Investors guess if it’s real or not

It’s basically astrology dressed up as due diligence.

Meanwhile, projects that look professional but are total rugs get approved. Projects that are legitimate but have rough branding get rejected. And investors have zero objective criteria to compare projects side-by-side.

Then MoonSale came along and did something different.

How MoonSale’s Security Score Actually Works

Instead of one human making a judgment call, MoonSale’s Security Score automatically evaluates every presale and fair launch across 11 weighted categories using on-chain data and publicly verifiable information.

No subjective judgment. No financial incentives. Just data.

Here are the 11 categories:

CRITICAL TIER (8 points each — these override everything):

Liquidity Lock Duration — How long are LP tokens locked?

• 365+ days = 8/8 points
• 180–364 days = 5.33/8 points
• 90–179 days = 2.67/8 points
• Under 90 days = 0 points (CRITICAL RISK)

Team Token Lock — Are founder tokens locked?

• Same scoring. Under 90 days = CRITICAL RISK

Contract Verified on Explorer — Is the token verified on BscScan/Etherscan?

• Yes = 8/8 points
• No = 0 points (CRITICAL RISK)

HIGH TIER (5 points each):

Presale Allocation % — How much supply goes to presale + liquidity?

• 55%+ = 5/5 points

Liquidity % — How much of raised funds go to DEX liquidity?

• 85%+ = 5/5 points

KYC Verified — Is the team doxxed and verified?

• Yes = 5/5 points

Audit Completed — Has the contract been professionally audited?

• Yes = 5/5 points

STANDARD TIER (2 points each):

Token Deposited On-Chain — Are tokens actually in the contract?

• Yes = 2/2 points

No Blacklist Function — Can the team blacklist addresses?

• Yes = 2/2 points

LOW TIER (1 point each):

Social Presence — Twitter, Telegram, Website, Logo?

• All 4 = 1/1 point

Softcap Size — Is it reasonable (50+ BNB)?

• Yes = 1/1 point

Total possible: 50 points

The Critical Risk Banner (This Is the Game Changer)

Here’s where MoonSale’s system gets brilliant.

Even if a project scores 45/50 overall, if it fails ANY of the three critical categories, MoonSale displays a red “CRITICAL RISKS DETECTED” banner.

A score of 45/50 means nothing if liquidity is locked for only 30 days.

A score of 45/50 means nothing if the contract isn’t verified.

A score of 45/50 means nothing if team tokens can dump anytime.

MoonSale forces you to see the red flags that actually matter.

This is the opposite of how traditional launchpads work. They bury the scary stuff in small text or don’t mention it at all. MoonSale puts it front and center.

What Makes This Better Than Human Vetting

Let me explain why automated scoring beats human judgment:

Human Vetting Problems:

• One person’s opinion = one point of failure
• That person has incentives (approved projects = more fees)
• Subjective judgment changes day to day
• Takes 10 minutes per project
• Inconsistent across 100+ projects

MoonSale’s Automated Scoring:

• Same criteria applied to every single project
• No incentives (it’s just code)
• Completely transparent (you can see exactly why a project scored what it did)
• Instant (evaluated on-chain automatically)
• Consistent across thousands of projects

As an investor, I can instantly compare 10 projects using the same 11 criteria. I don’t have to guess if the reviewer was having a good day.

Real-World Example: If Tofycoin Launched on MoonSale Today

Remember Tofycoin? They relaunched after getting rugged by PoolZ and BscLaunch.

Let’s say they launched on MoonSale with these parameters:

• Liquidity locked for 365 days? Yes = 8/8 points ✅
• Team tokens locked for 365 days? Yes = 8/8 points ✅
• Contract verified? Yes = 8/8 points ✅
• Presale allocation 55%+? Yes = 5/5 points ✅
• Liquidity 85%+? Yes = 5/5 points ✅
• KYC verified? Let’s say no = 0 points
• Audit completed? Let’s say no = 0 points
• Token deposited? Yes = 2/2 points ✅
• No blacklist? Yes = 2/2 points ✅
• Social presence? Yes = 1/1 point ✅
• Softcap 50+ BNB? Yes = 1/1 point ✅

Total: 40/50

No critical risks. All three critical categories green.

Investors would see:

• Green checkmarks on the three things that actually matter
• Clear visibility into what’s missing (KYC, audit)
• Ability to decide “Do I trust this team enough to invest?”

That’s radically different from “trust your gut.”

How Creators Can Get a Perfect Score

If you’re launching a project and want to maximize your Security Score, here’s the roadmap:

1. Lock LP for 365+ days (8 pts)
2. Lock team tokens for 365+ days via MoonSale Locker (8 pts)
3. Deploy token via MoonSale Token Generator — auto-verified on BscScan (8 pts)
4. Allocate 55%+ of supply to presale + liquidity combined (5 pts)
5. Set 85%+ of raised funds going to DEX liquidity (5 pts)
6. Get KYC verified ($200 flat fee, 24–48 hour turnaround) (5 pts)
7. Submit contract for audit ($100–500 depending on complexity, 3–7 days) (5 pts)
8. Ensure tokens are actually deposited in contract (2 pts)
9. Deploy without blacklist functions (2 pts)
10. Fill in all social fields: Twitter, Telegram, Website, Logo (1 pt)
11. Set softcap at 50+ BNB (1 pt)

Total: 50/50

A perfect score signals to investors: “This team is serious. They have nothing to hide. They locked everything. They verified everything. They audited everything.”

That’s worth something.

The Numbers Behind the Scoring

MoonSale publishes how many projects hit each tier:

• 40+/50 with no critical risks = “Strong” (safe for most investors)
• 30+/50 with no critical risks = “Reasonable” (do your own research)
• Below 30 = “High Risk” (probably skip)
• Any critical risk = “Red Flag” (avoid)

As of April 2026, approximately 35% of projects launching on MoonSale score 40+/50 with no critical risks. About 45% score 30–39. About 20% are below 30 or have critical risks.

That distribution makes sense. You’d expect most projects to be somewhat sketchy. The 35% in the strong category are the ones worth looking at.

On traditional launchpads, they don’t publish this data. You have no idea if most projects are legitimate or if rugs are the norm. (Spoiler: rugs are the norm.)

What This Means for the Crypto Industry

This is bigger than just MoonSale.

The Security Score system proves something fundamental: You can measure project safety objectively using on-chain data.

You don’t need gatekeepers. You don’t need human judgment. You don’t need subjective “vetting.”

You just need transparent criteria applied consistently to publicly available information.

Every launchpad could do this. Most don’t, because it doesn’t serve their interests. If investors can see that 80% of projects are sketchy, fewer people invest. If investors invest anyway, some will get rugged, and the launchpad’s reputation suffers.

But MoonSale’s business model is different. They make 2% on successful raises. If projects get rugged and nobody invests in future launches, MoonSale loses revenue. So they have every incentive to help investors pick safe projects.

That’s why they built an objective security system instead of hiding behind subjective vetting.

That’s also why this system will become the new standard.

The One Thing the Security Score Can’t Do

Before I wrap up: The Security Score is not a guarantee.

A project can score 50/50 and still be a scam. How?

• The team can doxx themselves but still steal money
• The contracts can be audited and still have logic vulnerabilities
• Liquidity can be locked and the team can still pivot to a completely different project

The Security Score protects you from certain types of attacks (early unlocks, hidden ownership, contract honeypots). It cannot protect you from human dishonesty.

What it does is shift the risk profile. Instead of “anything goes,” it becomes “you know exactly what you’re trusting and what you’re not.”

On traditional launchpads, you’re trusting that the launchpad reviewed the project. That’s one point of failure.

On MoonSale, you’re trusting that the smart contracts work correctly (they’re audited), that on-chain data is what it says it is (it always is), and that the team is honest (that’s on you to research).

Fewer points of failure. Clearer risk.

Why I’m Betting on This System

The Security Score works because it’s:

1. Transparent — You can click on any project and see exactly why it scored what it did
2. Immutable — Once deployed, the criteria don’t change based on who’s paying what
3. Real-time — Calculated automatically as projects get updated
4. Comparative — You can instantly compare 10 projects using the same 11 metrics
5. Incentive-aligned — MoonSale benefits when investors make good decisions

No traditional launchpad has all five of these. Most have zero.

That’s why MoonSale is becoming the launchpad of choice for serious investors and professional teams.

What Comes Next

MoonSale’s Phase 2 launches the MOON token and DAO governance. That means:

• The security criteria themselves can be voted on and adjusted by the community
• Revenue sharing starts flowing to MOON stakers (60% of all platform revenue)
• Special Vetted Launch program lets the DAO spotlight projects they believe in

Imagine this: as MOON stakers, we collectively maintain the Security Score system. We vote on what matters. We collectively benefit if the platform succeeds.

It’s a radical shift from “trust a centralized launchpad” to “be part of the system that protects the ecosystem.”

That’s the future.

The Bottom Line

If you’re an investor: Check the Security Score before you invest. If a project is below 40/50 or has critical risks, it doesn’t matter how good the pitch is. Skip it.

If you’re a founder: Build toward a 50/50 score. It’s not hard. It just signals that you respect your investors’ money. Lock tokens. Verify your contract. Get an audit. It costs money and time, but it’s the cost of building trust in 2026.

If you’re a launchpad: Copy this system or get left behind. The days of subjective vetting are over. Investors are tired of guessing.

The Security Score isn’t just a feature. It’s a statement that MoonSale trusts data more than people, transparency more than promises, and investor protection more than fees.

In an industry built on broken trust, that matters.

moonsale.app — Where every project is measured. Where investors can decide.

Support: t.me/maxis0