Why the Universe Needs Things to Actually Happen

Quantum mechanics describes possibilities. The real world needs definite events and history.

Imagine a uranium atom sealed inside a crystal, deep underground. No person (observer) is nearby. There’s no camera, detector, or laboratory. The atom may remain unchanged for a long time, and then its nucleus may suddenly decay. When that happens, it releases a particle that strikes nearby atoms and damages the crystal. It’s an actual recorded, historical event.

While quantum mechanics can calculate the chance (probability) that a nucleus will still be intact at a certain time, and the chance that it will already have decayed — the Schrödinger equation describes how the quantum state changes over time — it doesn’t obviously explain why one particular event becomes the event that actually happens.

In this case, the crystal ends up with a real mark in a real place. The mark may remain there for millions of years. Nothing had to look at it. The event became part of the physical history of the universe.

That raises a simple question: How do quantum possibilities become definite events?

Quantum Possibilities Can Interfere

Quantum possibilities are not exactly like ordinary uncertainty. Suppose a coin is hidden under a cup. You may not know whether it shows heads or tails, but the coin is already in one definite position. Your uncertainty is only a lack of information.

Quantum possibilities behave differently because they can interfere with one another. In the famous double-slit experiment, a particle can have two possible routes to the screen. As long as nothing records which route occurred, the two possibilities can combine. In some places they reinforce each other, and in other places they cancel each other.

This is called interference. It shows that the alternatives are doing more than sitting on a list of things that might happen. They remain connected parts of one quantum state and can affect where the particle is likely to appear.

Interference continues only while the alternatives remain isolated enough from the surrounding world. Once the environment begins carrying information about the different possibilities, the situation changes.

Entanglement Links Quantum Systems

Entanglement can begin with only two particles. Two particles can be created together in such a way that they share one combined quantum state. Their possible results are linked. For example, one possible outcome may pair a result for the first particle (spin up) with an opposite result for the second (spin down), while another possibility reverses those results.

Entanglement doesn’t mean that one particle has a predetermined agreement with the other (“ok, I’ll be spin up, and you be spin down”), nor can it send an instant secret message, faster than the speed of light, across the universe (as Einstein said, nothing travels faster than the speed of light). Entanglement means the two particles can’t be completely described as separate objects with independent quantum states. The pair must be described as one connected system.

Most importantly, entanglement doesn’t choose an outcome. It connects the possible outcomes. Both correlated possibilities can remain in the combined quantum state.

Now suppose one of those entangled particles strikes an atom in a rock. The atom becomes linked to the particle’s possible outcomes. Nearby atoms then interact with that atom. Vibrations spread through the rock. Photons scatter from it. The original entanglement spreads into a much larger object.

Decoherence Is Entanglement Spreading

This spreading of entanglement into the environment is called decoherence. A small quantum system becomes linked with more and more surrounding matter. The different possibilities become connected to different states of the environment.

Imagine a particle that might travel along two paths. If the surrounding world remains the same for both paths, the alternatives can still interfere. But suppose one path causes a photon to scatter left while the other causes it to scatter right. The photon now carries information about the path.

More photons scatter. More atoms become involved. Soon, one possible path is linked to one enormous state of the environment, while the other path is linked to a different enormous state. The alternatives can no longer easily come back together and interfere.

This is why large objects (rocks, keys) look definite and classical. A rock constantly interacts with light, heat, surrounding particles, and other matter. Different possible positions or conditions of the rock quickly become entangled with different states of the environment.

But decoherence does not necessarily remove any possibility. It separates the alternatives so thoroughly that they no longer interfere with one another. The full quantum state may still contain them.

That’s the key distinction:

Decoherence separates the possibilities. Collapse (into a definite state) selects one.

Decoherence Is Not Collapse

Return to the uranium atom inside the crystal. Before the decay, the quantum state includes the possibility that the nucleus remains intact, and possibilities in which it has decayed. Once decay products strike the surrounding crystal, the difference spreads outward.

One alternative contains an intact uranium nucleus and an undamaged part of the crystal. Another contains a daughter nucleus, an emitted particle, displaced atoms, heat, and a damage track. These alternatives rapidly become entangled with different states of the surrounding rock.

That is decoherence. The alternatives stop interfering in any practical way. But ordinary decoherence doesn’t say that one alternative disappears and the other survives.

Collapse of the wavefunction would be the additional step in which one of the possible outcomes becomes the actual outcome. The nucleus decayed at this time. The particle traveled in this direction (not that). The crystal was damaged in this place (not that). The other alternatives are no longer part of the post-collapse state.

In an interpretation that includes real collapse, decoherence can be understood as pre-collapse. It prepares the possible outcomes by separating them into stable, distinct histories. Collapse would then choose one of those histories.

[In a no-collapse interpretation, such as Many-Worlds, no choice is made. All the separated histories continue in different branches of the universal quantum state.]

A Crystal Begins Growing in One Place

Consider supercooled water. Water can remain liquid below its normal freezing temperature until a small region begins forming an ice crystal. Once that first stable crystal appears, nearby molecules join it. The crystal grows outward from that starting point.

Many starting points may have been possible. The first crystal could have formed in one region or another. It could have begun with a different orientation. Each beginning would lead to a different final crystal structure.

Decoherence explains why a crystal beginning on one side of the droplet doesn’t continue interfering with a crystal beginning somewhere else. Each possibility quickly becomes linked to different positions of countless molecules, different vibrations, and different releases of heat.

But the droplet we see freezes in one particular way. One crystal begins in one place and grows into one structure. If only one actual droplet exists, something must account for why that history became the real one.

A Cosmic Ray Makes One Particle Shower

A cosmic ray can strike an atom high in Earth’s atmosphere. That collision creates several new particles, which then collide with other atoms and create still more particles. The result is a large shower spreading through the atmosphere.

Quantum mechanics allows many possible outcomes for the first collision. The outgoing particles could have different energies and travel in different directions. Each of those possibilities would lead to a different later shower.

As the shower develops, the alternatives become entangled with enormous numbers of atmospheric atoms and particles. Decoherence separates the possible shower histories. They no longer interfere with one another.

Yet there is only one historical event. One actual atmosphere appears to contain one particular shower. Energy is deposited in certain places. Certain atoms are struck. Certain particles reach the ground. If there is only one world, the universe must have one actual sequence of events.

The Early Universe Had the Same Problem

The strongest example comes from the early universe. According to modern cosmology, tiny quantum fluctuations helped produce small differences in the density of matter. Gravity later enlarged those differences. Denser regions gathered more matter and eventually helped form galaxies and clusters.

Different quantum possibilities would have produced different arrangements of matter. One possibility might place a slightly denser region here, while another places it somewhere else. Over billions of years, those small differences would grow into very different cosmic structures.

There was no human observer. There was no detector outside the universe. The universe itself contained the quantum possibilities, the entanglement, and the decoherence.

Today, matter is arranged in one particular pattern of galaxies, clusters, and empty regions. If there is one actual universe, then the question remains: Why did this possible pattern become the real cosmic history?

Why Definite Events Are Needed

Definite events are needed because later events depend on earlier ones. A radioactive decay changes a crystal. The beginning of an ice crystal determines how the rest of it grows. A particle collision determines the later shape of a cosmic-ray shower. A tiny density difference influences where galaxies eventually form.

These aren’t merely observations. They are physical causes. The universe becomes different because something happened.

A probability describes what might happen. It doesn’t, by itself, give us one history. A list of possible crystal structures isn’t an actual crystal. A map of possible lightning paths isn’t an actual bolt of lightning. A wavefunction containing different possible universes isn’t automatically one actual universe.

If there is only one actual world, then physics needs a way to distinguish between what could have happened and what did happen. That is the ontological problem: the problem of explaining what really exists.

The Universe Doesn’t Need a Conscious Observer

The word “measurement” (or “observation”) often makes this sound like a problem about people. It’s not. A radioactive nucleus can decay in an empty cave. A crystal can grow in space. A cosmic ray can strike the atmosphere. Galaxies can form without anyone watching.

Consciousness isn’t needed for entanglement or decoherence. Matter interacts with matter. Information about quantum alternatives spreads through the environment. Interference disappears.

The remaining question is whether decoherence is enough. If every decohered possibility remains real in a different branch, then the universe doesn’t choose one global history. That’s the Many-Worlds answer.

But if there’s only one actual universe, decoherence can’t be the end of the story. Something must select one outcome, or something else must identify which history is actual.

The universe can’t run on possibilities forever — not if there’s only one world. At some point, possibility must become history.

Decoherence explains why the alternatives stop interfering.

Collapse, if it occurs, explains why only one remains.

And the difference between those two ideas is the difference between describing what might happen and explaining what actually exists.

How might a Video Game Engine solve the problem?

A game-engine analogy offers one possible way to think about the problem: the underlying quantum state could contain many possible outcomes, while the “world” that becomes physically definite is rendered only as events unfold. In a video game, the engine may contain many possible paths, locations, and interactions, but it doesn’t need to fully instantiate every possible future at once; it generates a definite scene based on the current state and what’s actually happening. Applied to quantum mechanics, decoherence could be imagined as the stage where alternatives become distinct enough to form separate possible histories, while a deeper rule of the universe selects or “renders” one of them into the actual world. This wouldn’t be part of standard quantum mechanics, but as an ontology it offers a way to distinguish the full space of quantum possibilities from the single definite history we experience.

A video game requires a conscious observer (a player) — with a joystick or game controller providing inputs. Video games are developed for the purpose of players’ enjoyment (and to make money for the vendor), but if the player stands up and walks out of the room for a few minutes, the game keeps playing and makes decisions. The existence of the video game — the renderer — in the universe is deeply tied to human intent, purpose, design and consciousness.

A Message from AI Mind

Thanks for being a part of our community! Before you go:

• 👏 Clap for the story and follow the author 👉
• 📰 View more content in the AI Mind Publication
• 🧠 Improve your AI prompts effortlessly and FREE
• 🧰 Discover Intuitive AI Tools