← Back to list

Consulting scales with people; product scales with technology

“Product” implies BOTH customer-focused AND standard offerings. Customer-focused and fully custom white-glove is a consulting model, not a…

Jason Yip · 2026-04-25 14:31 · 5 claps · 1.1 min read
#product-management #product-operating-model #customer-focus #standardization #product-development
Open on Medium ↗
Wiki topics: BIZ · Business Strategy 📋 · Product Management ⏱️ · Productivity 💑 · Relationships

Consulting scales with people; product scales with technology

“True Product” is high degree of customer focus AND high degree of standardisation

“True Product” is high degree of customer focus AND high degree of standardisation

“Product” implies BOTH customer-focused AND standard offerings. Customer-focused and fully custom white-glove is a consulting model, not a product model. The consulting model scales with headcount; the product model scales with technology.

Top‑Right: True Product Model

High Customer Focus × High Standardisation “Standardised solutions built for customer needs.”

Why this is the product quadrant

  • Deep understanding of customer problems
  • Solutions expressed as repeatable, scalable offerings
  • Technology, not headcount, drives scale
  • Clear roadmap, consistent experience

Examples

  • SaaS platforms
  • Internal platforms with paved paths
  • APIs, reusable capabilities

Top‑Left: Custom Consulting / White‑Glove Delivery

High Customer Focus × Low Standardisation “Every customer gets something different.”

Why this is consulting

  • Tailored, bespoke solutions
  • High-touch, high-variability delivery
  • Revenue and throughput scale with people
  • Hard to maintain consistency or roadmap

Examples

  • Custom engineering projects
  • Bespoke integrations
  • One-off automations

Bottom‑Right: Standardised Services

Low Customer Focus × High Standardisation “Standard offerings with limited tailoring.”

Why this matters

  • Repeatable playbooks, templates, or modules
  • Efficient delivery, but not fully self-serve
  • Often a transitional state toward a true product

Examples

  • Standard onboarding packages
  • Migration accelerators
  • Assessment frameworks

Bottom‑Left: Experiments

Low Customer Focus × Low Standardisation “Not yet customer-driven, not yet repeatable.”

Why this quadrant exists

  • Early-stage discovery
  • Useful for learning, not scaling
  • Often where platform teams start before codifying patterns

Examples

  • Proofs of concept
  • One-off internal tools
  • Early platform capabilities

메타데이터
post_id
2852c58e1012
slug
degree-of-customer-focus-vs-degree-of-standardisation-2852c58e1012
url
https://medium.com/@jchyip/degree-of-customer-focus-vs-degree-of-standardisation-2852c58e1012
canonical_url
https://medium.com/@jchyip/degree-of-customer-focus-vs-degree-of-standardisation-2852c58e1012
author_url
https://medium.com/@jchyip
status
ok
fetched_at
2026-06-11 10:13:20