Former Miss Universe Canada Delegate Fights Back After Alleged Defamation by Prominent Influencer

MIAMI — Chealse Sophia Howell, internationally known model, entrepreneur, and former Miss Universe Canada titleholder, has taken decisive legal action following what she describes as false and harmful online claims made by sales and real estate personality Grant Cardone and Cardone Capital.

According to court filings filed on December 11, 2025 in Miami-Dade County civil court, Ms. Howell alleges she was targeted by a campaign of defamatory statements spread across widely viewed social media channels. Those statements — which she categorically denies — allegedly included accusations of criminal behavior in the Middle East, damaging her reputation and impacting her ability to secure business relationships, sponsorships, and professional contracts.

The lawsuit claims these communications were amplified through the defendants’ extensive digital networks, resulting in emotional distress and concerns about her personal safety.

The impact of these allegations, Howell asserts, has extended beyond her professional endeavors. She notes that the stress caused by the campaign has affected her personal life, leading to sleepless nights and heightened anxiety about public interactions. Friends and associates, she says, have expressed concern about how these claims could tarnish her standing in professional and social circles.

The complaint outlines multiple causes of action including various types of defamation and tortious interference with Ms. Howell’s business opportunities. She is seeking $500 million in damages, along with court orders to prevent further alleged defamatory conduct and reimbursement of legal costs.

Experts in media law note that cases like Howell’s are becoming more common as influencers and public figures wield significant online reach. According to legal analysts, the use of social media to spread potentially damaging statements can magnify the effects on victims, making swift legal action critical to protect reputations and future opportunities.

“My priority has always been to build meaningful professional relationships and create opportunities for others,” said Howell in a statement, “and I will not allow baseless allegations to overshadow that work.” (Attorney statement as quoted in filings.)

The lawsuit also raises questions about accountability in the digital age. While social media platforms provide a space for free expression, courts have increasingly had to balance this with the responsibility public figures have to avoid causing harm through false statements. Howell’s case may set a precedent for how defamation claims are handled against high-profile influencers with substantial followings.

No finding of liability has been made by the court at this stage.

Supporters of Howell have voiced their backing on social media and through industry statements, emphasizing her professionalism and integrity. Many highlight her long-standing contributions to modeling, entrepreneurship, and advocacy work, portraying her as someone unfairly targeted by unverified claims.

While the legal process unfolds, Howell continues her professional work, participating in modeling campaigns and entrepreneurial ventures. She maintains that her focus remains on growing her brand and supporting collaborations that align with her values. Legal observers predict that the case could take months to resolve, given the high-profile nature of the parties involved and the complex issues surrounding online defamation and business interference.

As digital influence continues to expand, cases like Howell’s highlight the growing intersection between social media, personal reputation, and the legal system. Observers suggest that the outcome could influence how public figures engage online and the responsibilities they carry when addressing or referencing other professionals in their content.

Regardless of the legal outcome, Howell’s actions underscore a broader message about standing up to reputational attacks and seeking recourse when personal and professional harm occurs. Her pursuit of justice reflects an increasing awareness among public figures about protecting their names and careers in an era where information spreads instantly across digital platforms.

Also Check:

***https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Uyk_ZHhL84JKT_v2_UdsSYS_XgD7TR-t/view?usp=drivesdk***

***https://drive.google.com/file/d/1crUZMoULb3sVNaSAXn_amXsl_B_bMFO0/view?usp=drivesdk***