← Back to list

The Day AI took a seat at the conference table (and we ate samosas)

On tuesday, we (the product team) packed our creative production team the folks who build campaigns and assets day in and day out into our…

Jahnavee Ramalingam · 2026-01-16 10:13 · 0 claps · 5.0 min read
#agentic-ai #ui #ux #enterprise-design
Open on Medium ↗
Wiki topics: AGT · AI Agents MKT · Marketing · General

The day AI took a seat at the conference table (and we ate samosas)

On tuesday, we (the product team) packed our creative production team the folks who build campaigns and assets day in and day out into our new conference room, that was objectively too small for the headcount, but just right for the energy we needed. The air conditioning was icy, the Wi-Fi was suspect, and the atmosphere was a mix of skepticism and hunger.

Laptops open. Screens mirrored. Half the team leaning forward in their chairs. Someone balancing a notebook on their knees because there were not enough tables to go around.

And yes, there were samosas. Still warm. Still flaky. The unofficial fuel of workdays where something important is about to happen.

We started the session by trying to answer the elephant in the room: What exactly is AI Studio?

Before the samosas were even unboxed, there were five different definitions floating around. Some thought it was the agentic chat. Others, a workflow improver.

It felt a bit like that classic scene from Superman “It’s a bird! It’s a plane!” except we were all squinting at a screen, trying to figure out how to decipher our full-blown autonomous colleague.

But as the session unfolded, the real definition clicked. AI Studio isn’t just a tool or a wrapper; it’s a symbiotic system built on three distinct layers. It combines Sentinel (the perception layer that sees market reality), AI Agents (the execution layer that does the work), and Human Experts (the supervision layer that ensures safety and strategy). It’s a full-stack creative operation.

At the time, it felt like a regular internal working session. A demo. A walkthrough. A “let’s see how this holds up” kind of meeting.

But looking back, I realized there was one more attendee in that room than I had counted.

We were there to test drive our AI Chat with the managed services team. Not in a sandbox. Not with a polished deck. With a real client workflow. Specifically, we wanted to see if our agentic AI could handle one of the most familiar, operationally heavy tasks we do. Spinning up multiple creative projects for an oral hygiene retailer needing PDP images.

This is the kind of work that looks deceptively simple from the outside. Import spreadsheets. Create layers. Generate variants. Name things correctly. Follow brand rules. Make sure nothing breaks when you hit export.

Anyone who has actually done this work knows the truth. It is repetitive, detail-heavy, and mentally expensive in a way that drains you long before the “creative” part even begins.

The copy-paste epiphany

The stated goal of the session was adoption.

We wanted the managed services team to experience AI Chat not as a shiny GenAI layer on top of existing workflows, but as a full-stack creative system. Something that could actually carry weight in the day-to-day reality of delivery work.

So we threw a real project at it.

In the before times, this would have meant manual setup. A lot of invisible labor that never shows up in decks or case studies.

Yesterday, the agent took the prompt, ingested the brief, and simply did the work.

Midway through, as the screen filled up with neatly structured assets, someone from the managed services team leaned in and said, almost under their breath, “Wait. This is just like copy-paste?”

That line stuck with me.

Because yes, it was like copy-paste. But not the dumb kind. Not the brittle kind.

It was intelligent copy-paste. Context-aware copy-paste. Copy-paste that understands brand rules, formats, and scale.

What we were watching in real time was a very clean expression of a philosophy we talk about a lot but rarely get to see this clearly.

Systems execute. Humans move up the stack.

The agents handled the combinatorial chaos. The explosion of sizes, SKUs, weird taxonomy requests and formats. The room handled strategy, judgment, and decision-making.

Also, the chutney distribution.

The parts that broke were the most valuable

From a design perspective, sitting in that room was equal parts exhilarating and mildly horrifying.

Exhilarating because the agents were doing real work. Not demos. Not toy examples. Actual production tasks. Taking in the reality of the brief and the assets, and acting on it.

Horrifying because nothing exposes UX flaws faster than a live session with real users and zero patience for polish.

The AI moved fast. Sometimes faster than the interface could comfortably explain what was happening. There were moments where the conversation flow stumbled. Where feedback could have been clearer. Where the system did the right thing but did not quite say it in the right way.

In a quieter setting, these might have felt like small issues.

In a crowded conference room, they were impossible to ignore.

And honestly, that was a gift.

Those moments gave us more signal than weeks of controlled usability testing. This is what agentic experiences do. They turn UX from a set of screens into a relationship. A back-and-forth. And relationships break in very specific ways.

Yesterday showed us exactly where ours needs work.

The invisible colleague effect

The biggest takeaway was not speed. Or accuracy. Or even adoption, though that mattered.

It was presence.

By the end of the session, the AI agent felt like it was part of the room. It was reacting to feedback. It was adjusting outputs. It was quietly absorbing the parts of the workflow that usually exhaust teams before the day even begins.

We talk about agentic workflows a lot, and I am guilty of using that phrase myself. On bad days, it can sound like buzzword soup.

Yesterday, it stopped being abstract.

Agentic, in practice, meant there was something in the room taking responsibility for execution. Something that did not get bored, did not miss a step, and did not need a reminder to follow brand rules.

That changes the shape of work.

If this is where creative operations are headed, smart agents handling scale while humans handle taste, judgment, and intent, then this feels like a real inflection point. Not a hype cycle. Not a slide in a roadmap. An actual shift in how work gets done.

Now, if we can teach the agent to clean up the samosa crumbs on the conference table after the meeting, I think we will have truly achieved full-stack intelligence.

Until then, this feels like a very good start.


메타데이터
post_id
31ec4e07c441
slug
the-day-ai-took-a-seat-at-the-conference-table-and-we-ate-samosas-31ec4e07c441
url
https://medium.com/@jahnaveeramalingam/the-day-ai-took-a-seat-at-the-conference-table-and-we-ate-samosas-31ec4e07c441
canonical_url
https://medium.com/@jahnaveeramalingam/the-day-ai-took-a-seat-at-the-conference-table-and-we-ate-samosas-31ec4e07c441
author_url
https://medium.com/@jahnaveeramalingam
status
ok
fetched_at
2026-08-28 02:11:24