The Truth About the Devil: A Question of Division

**Home / The Satsang blog**

The Truth About the Devil

Summary : The word devil is often understood as a figure of evil. Yet its original meaning points to something much simpler: that which divides. By returning to this root, it becomes possible to understand evil not as an external entity, but as an inner experience of separation, confusion, and dispersion. This text explores this idea by connecting it to lived experience, thoughts, and the possibility of rediscovering unity.

The word devil comes from the Greek diabolos, derived from the verb diaballein, meaning “to separate,” “to divide,” or “to slander.”

This simple definition is enough to shift perspective-from an external image to a more direct understanding.

Division as Inner Experience

Division is not just an idea. It is something we experience.

By contrast, there are moments when something gathers. Attention becomes simpler, steadier, more present. There is then a sense of unity, not constructed, but recognized.

This division does not always remain at the individual level. When it is shared, repeated, and reinforced, it takes on a broader dimension. The same patterns of confusion, fear, and opposition circulate from one person to another, strengthening and organizing themselves.

What is experienced inwardly can thus become a collective phenomenon. Not an entity in itself, but a dynamic fed by repeated divisions. What some traditions call an egregore refers precisely to this: an accumulation of similar movements that eventually takes on a certain coherence and influence.

In this sense, the devil is not only what divides within us, but also what, through individuals, sustains and amplifies division.

This dynamic, whether individual or collective, finds its most direct anchor in the functioning of the mind.

This division largely unfolds within the workings of the mind.

Some thoughts soothe, clarify, and unify. Others fragment, oppose, and create tension. It is not only situations that generate confusion, but the way they are perceived, interpreted, and extended inwardly.

When the mind operates without discernment, it produces a chain of reactions, identifications, and judgments that reinforce separation.

This has been described in some traditions as a form of false ego: not the ego necessary for individual experience, but a rigid identification with thoughts and mental constructions.

Across traditions, a similar intuition appears, expressed in different languages.

In Christianity, the devil is the one who divides and deceives. In Buddhism, Māra represents forces that pull one away from clarity and awakening. In other traditions, evil is not an independent reality, but a form of ignorance or imbalance.

These perspectives are not identical, but they converge on one point: what distances us from truth is not only external, but rooted in inner confusion.

Understanding this does not mean denying the existence of evil, nor turning it into an abstraction. Rather, it means recognizing, within experience, what unites and what divides. What unites is simple, stable, present. What divides is multiple, unstable, and scattered.

Conversely, what unites, gathers, and clarifies opens the way to a simpler and more direct understanding of what is lived.

If you have any questions, please write here: madhyama.marga@gmail.com

Originally published at https://www.yoga-originel.fr on April 8, 2026.