Sometimes I boldly comment on articles similar to yours with an emphasis on tools from general…

Sometimes I boldly comment on articles similar to yours with an emphasis on tools from general semantics which I think presumably appear critical from most readers, but my intentions are not aggressive. My purpose in my previous response was to highlight that the use of words and language have absolutely no barring on any truth. Opinions and verbs exist, but not nouns. A lot of writers fall into the trap of not protecting their opinions or views. “Boldly speaking”, when I direct a message toward someone, I can avoid indirect afflictions toward individuals and remain safe by using myself as a reference point. In addition, if I implement eprime into my writings then individual realities do not fall prey to aristotelian logic.