I Listed on 30+ Directories. My DR Climbed to 21. Then Stopped
TL;DR: I followed every “list on these directories for DR growth” tweet I could find. Submitted to 30+ sites over three weeks. My Domain…
I Listed on 30+ Directories. My DR Climbed to 21. Then Stopped
TL;DR: I followed every “list on these directories for DR
growth” tweet I could find. Submitted to 30+ sites over three weeks. My Domain Rating went from 0 to 21 — and then stopped moving. Here’s what Ahrefs showed me about why.

I’m a solo founder. After my Product Hunt launch on April 15, I needed backlinks. Fast. Every X thread I read said the same thing:
“List your tool on these 50 AI directories. DR 50 in weeks.”
So I started submitting.
Day 1: 5 directories. Week 1: 15. Week 3: 30+.
My DR went from 0 to 21. Then it stopped. For two weeks straight, no movement.
I assumed I just needed more directories. So I submitted to more. Nothing changed.
Then I connected Ahrefs and looked at what I actually had.
What 30+ submissions actually delivered
Ahrefs showed 2,400 backlinks from 89 domains. On paper, that sounds like progress.
In reality, here’s what most of those links were:
307 redirects — When a directory listing links to your site, it often goes through their own server first (via a 307 redirect). Ahrefs counts the redirect as a backlink. But the link equity rarely transfers through that hop.
nofollow tags — Many directories that advertise “dofollow links” actually use rel=”nofollow” in the HTML. The button might say “Visit Site” but the underlying link tells search engines: “don’t pass authority through this.”
SPAM tags— Ahrefs flagged a chunk of my backlinks with red SPAM labels. These come from auto-generated listing sites — the kind that scrape data and create listings programmatically.
Uniform anchor text — Every directory uses the same button: “Visit Website” or “Get Started” or sometimes the literal URL. None of it reads like a human writing “this AI research tool helped me.” Search engines treat that uniformity as a signal that nothing organic is happening.
After filtering for what actually counted — links that were dofollow, not redirects, not flagged SPAM, with varied anchor text — I had 14 domains. Not 89.
That’s the actual ceiling for what 30+ directories produced.
Why DR 21 was the cap
Ahrefs’ DR is roughly logarithmic. Going from DR 0 to DR 20 is straightforward — you just need legitimate links from sites that exist. Going from DR 20 to DR 30 requires links from sites that themselves have DR 30+.
Most directories sit at DR 30–50 on the surface. But when their links pass through redirects or nofollow, the authority doesn’t transfer. So you’re functionally getting links from “DR 5” sources, not DR 50 sources.
That’s the gap between the X advice and reality.
“List on these 50 directories for DR 50” works as a theoretical statement. The math could check out — IF the links were clean dofollow, IF they passed through without redirects, IF the anchor text varied.
In practice, almost none of those conditions hold for free AI directories.
What I should have done differently
Looking back, the directory submission phase wasn’t useless. It got me to DR 21, which is “the site exists and someone vouches for it” territory.
But I overstayed in this phase. After about 15–20 submissions, the marginal value dropped to near zero. I should have stopped and moved to:
- HARO / Featured.com — pitches to journalists for in-article citations (real dofollow from real articles)
- Comparison article inclusion— finding existing “Best AI Research Tools 2026” articles and asking to be added
- Individual blogger outreach — getting reviewed by someone who actually uses the tool
These don’t scale the way directories do. You can submit to 30 directories in a week. You can get into maybe 1 real article in a month.
But the article gives you what 30 directories couldn’t: a clean, in-content, dofollow link from a real site that isn’t trying to look like a real site.
The honest framing
If you’re early-stage and want a baseline DR, directories are fine. They get you to roughly DR 20.
After that, you’re done with directories. The next 50 won’t move the number much. Your time is worth more spent on one HARO pitch than on twenty more directory submissions.
The X advice isn’t entirely wrong. It’s just optimized for the first three weeks of a new domain — and then it stops being true.
What I’m doing now
Submitting to: zero new directories.
Working on: HARO pitches (slow), comparison article outreach (slower), Substack with direct links to my report pages (slowest, but highest quality).
DR: still 21, occasionally 23.
The number doesn’t move week to week the way it did at the start. That’s the boring middle. I’m trying to be patient enough to stay there.
— -
This is part of a series of build-in-public posts about launching OriginBrief , an AI-powered research monitoring tool, as a solo founder.
메타데이터
- post_id
- 81bb484d020a
- slug
- i-listed-on-30-directories-my-dr-climbed-to-21-then-stopped-81bb484d020a
- url
- https://blog.startupstash.com/i-listed-on-30-directories-my-dr-climbed-to-21-then-stopped-81bb484d020a
- canonical_url
- https://blog.startupstash.com/i-listed-on-30-directories-my-dr-climbed-to-21-then-stopped-81bb484d020a
- author_url
- https://medium.com/@fukuda.aritomo
- status
- ok
- fetched_at
- 2026-06-09 15:37:30