Zaros’ Eye: Tariffs Edition

Welcome to Zaros’ Eye: Tariffs Edition 👁️

In this special edition of our traditional Zaros’ Eye, we’re diving deep into what moved the market this week: Trump’s tariffs. Keep reading for a full overview of what motivated Trump to impose the tariffs, and the aftermath of the event 👇

Intro

In early April 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump launched a sweeping “reciprocal tariff” initiative that marked a dramatic escalation in trade policy. Announced on April 2, 2025, a day Trump dubbed “Liberation Day” for U.S. trade, the plan imposed new tariffs on virtually all U.S. imports.

Trump framed the move as rectifying decades of unfair trade practices and large trade deficits that he argued had hollowed out American industry and threatened U.S. economic security.

Trumps’ Rationale for “Reciprocal” Tariffs

The reciprocal tariff initiative was rooted in his longstanding critique that U.S. trade partners impose higher barriers on American goods than the U.S. does on theirs. The President argued that a lack of reciprocity, from higher foreign tariffs to non-tariff barriers and currency manipulation, had contributed to chronic U.S. trade deficits, which he called an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to America’s economy and even national security. On April 2, 2025, invoking emergency authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Trump declared a national emergency over the trade deficit and “underlying conditions” of unfair trade, setting the stage for immediate tariff action.

Trump presented the tariffs as a fulfillment of his “America First” trade promises. In a Rose Garden event on April 2 (branded “Make America Wealthy Again”), he unveiled charts comparing foreign vs. U.S. tariff rates and insisted he was simply asking other countries to “follow the golden rule on trade: Treat us like we treat you.” The President acknowledged the likelihood of “short-term pain” for consumers and businesses but promised “long-term gain” from a fairer trade environment. April 2 was proclaimed “Liberation Day” signaling America’s intent to free itself from what Trump called the injustices of the current system.

In Trump’s view, past administrations had allowed trading partners to take advantage of the U.S., and only drastic action — tariffs he termed “reciprocal” or “mirror-image” tariffs — could level the playing field.

A wide range of factors in early 2025 provided context for Trump’s timing. In January, he had ordered investigations into the causes of U.S. goods trade deficits and foreign trade abuses, with findings delivered by April 1. Those findings presumably reinforced his claims that foreign practices (like subsidies, lax labor standards, and VAT taxes on U.S. imports) unfairly disadvantaged American companies. Additionally, U.S. economic growth had been slowing, and Trump faced pressure to show decisive action on his economic agenda soon after taking office in 2025.

The Plan

On April 2, President Trump signed an executive order titled “Regulating Imports with a Reciprocal Tariff to Rectify Trade Practices that Contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods Trade Deficits.” The order introduced a two-tier tariff regime affecting nearly all U.S. trading partners:

• 10% Universal Tariff: A baseline 10% tariff would apply on all imports from all countries (with only narrow exceptions), effective April 5, 2025. This acted as an across-the-board import tax intended to raise the cost of foreign goods.

• Higher “Reciprocal” Tariffs on Specific Countries: In addition to the 10% base, 57 countries identified as having large trade surpluses with the U.S. or onerous trade barriers were assigned elevated tariff rates ranging from 11% up to 50%. These higher rates were scheduled to take effect April 9, 2025.

• Indefinite Duration with Conditional Adjustment: The tariffs would remain in effect indefinitely until Trump determined that the targeted trade practices and deficits had been remedied. The order gave the President latitude to increase tariffs further if trading partners retaliated, or to reduce tariffs if countries improved their trade practices.

• Exceptions and Exempt Goods: Some imports are exempt from the new duties, including humanitarian goods, personal baggage, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, copper, lumber, energy products, and certain critical minerals. Imports from countries under sanctions (like North Korea or Russia) are unaffected.

• Canada and Mexico: Already subject to 25% tariffs under a separate IEEPA order tied to border security, they were not included in the new tariff list. USMCA-compliant goods remain duty-free.

Selected Reciprocal Tariff Rates by Country (April 2025):

Reactions from Key Economic and Political Figures

• Jerome Powell

Powell warned that the tariffs were “likely to raise inflation” and dampen growth, and indicated the Fed may need to delay rate cuts. He cautioned against turning short-term price spikes into “ongoing inflation problems.”

• Larry Fink (BlackRock)

Fink said many CEOs believe the U.S. is already in a recession and warned that confidence was eroding fast. He understood Trump’s rationale for seeking “symmetry,” but emphasized the short-term economic risks.

• Jamie Dimon (JPMorgan)

Dimon warned of higher inflation and a probable slowdown, calling the tariffs “considerable turbulence.” He predicted it would hurt growth even without a full-blown recession.

• Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent

Though publicly supporting parts of the tariff strategy, Bessent was reportedly considering resignation over the policy’s breadth and long-term consequences.

International Responses and Retaliatory Measures

👉 China

China retaliated immediately with its own 34% tariff on all U.S. goods. It also:

• Banned exports of rare earths to U.S. companies

• Blacklisted 11 U.S. firms

• Launched antitrust probes into American companies

• Halted imports of select U.S. agricultural goods

China signaled it would not back down, with analysts expecting a long conflict.

👉 European Union

The EU sought dialogue but prepared retaliation. It planned:

• A WTO complaint

• A list of politically sensitive U.S. exports for potential tariffs

• Emergency trade talks in Washington

The EU emphasized unity and diplomacy but would not tolerate long-term U.S. discrimination.

👉 Japan, South Korea, UK

These allies expressed concern but avoided immediate retaliation. Some sought exemptions or clarification.

👉 India, Vietnam, Thailand

Reacted strongly, with threats of WTO complaints or retaliatory tariffs. India targeted U.S. agricultural goods and motorcycles.

👉 Turkey

Instead of retaliating, Turkey saw an opportunity: it pushed for a free trade agreement with the U.S. and sought to fill gaps left by other countries hit with higher tariffs.

👉 WTO & IMF

Both institutions criticized the U.S. move. The WTO warned of rule violations; the IMF warned of global growth slowdowns if escalation continues.

Market Reaction

In recent developments, President Donald Trump’s implementation of new tariffs has shaken the global markets, extending significant impacts to the realm of cryptocurrencies.

Following the announcement of the new tariffs, notable cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ether, and XRP witnessed substantial declines. On April 7, 2025, Bitcoin plummeted to approximately $76,000 from its February peak of over $100,000. Similarly, Ether and XRP saw decreases of around 14%, with values dipping to $1,507 and $1.78 respectively.

The repercussions of the tariffs also spilled over into the stock market, as ​global stock markets have experienced significant volatility following President Donald Trump’s recent tariff announcements.

Yesterday the S&P 500 declined by 0.23%, closing at 5,062.25, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.91% to 37,965.60. In contrast, the Nasdaq Composite saw a modest increase of 0.10%, ending at 15,603.26. European markets were also affected, with Germany’s DAX dropping 9.4% and the Stoxx 600 down 5.3%.

In Asia, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index plummeted over 13%, marking its worst single-day loss since 1997. These market movements reflect growing investor concerns about the potential for a global economic slowdown triggered by escalating trade tensions.​

Companies deeply ingrained in the cryptocurrency sector took a hard hit yesterday too. Stocks of firms such as Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), Coinbase, and prominent Bitcoin miners like Riot Platforms and Mara Holdings, recorded declines of up to 12%.

Conclusion

Trump’s April 2025 reciprocal tariff policy marks a seismic shift in U.S. trade strategy. Designed to enforce fairness, it has so far provoked global retaliation, business anxiety, inflation fears, and market turmoil.

While the long-term effects are uncertain, the short-term reality is clear: global trade is entering a period of confrontation, not cooperation. Unless negotiations can ease tensions, the world may be headed toward a full-blown trade war with significant economic consequences.

Follow Zaros for more insights and trade informed!

Our official links

*Youtube*

*Telegram*

*Discord*

*Twitter*

*Website*

*Dapp*

*Debank*