— — — — — — — — — — — Ideology of Napoleon Bonaparte and Capitalism — — — — — — — — -

— — — — — — — — — — — Ideology of Napoleon Bonaparte and Capitalism — — — — — — — — -

Napoleon Bonaparte was one of the pioneers for the establishment of the constitution of equity, friendship and freedom against the royal aristocracy. That dream he dreamed to establish on the chest of the world through the breaking up conventional society and state that had never been implemented. Particularly, to ebb the conventional and backdated social-state system, he wanted to form discrimination and exploitation free society and state that was supposed to be formed all over the world. A new world that was supposed to be created through the collapse of kingdom, and kingdom based aristocratic monarchy. Due to Napoleon’s dream, the constitutional-judicial-law departments would have been supposed to be free from the king’s aristocrat attitude, all civic rights, social-political rights, religious-free speech rights, the increase of national senses, and privileges would have been supposed to be equal to all. No inequity or injustice would have been supposed to be visible in the new society or in the new state.

At that time, all powers or divine rights were taken over to the king that was supposed to be granted towards the king by God. This kind of doctrine is totally rejected by Napoleon’s ideology. That dream was brought to light by his hand that had dissipated all over the world. In the middle age of western history, religious conflict based on Protestantism and Catholicism divided Christianity. In the modern era, the power of the king increased which is why the control of everything went to

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Ideology of Napoleon Bonaparte and Capitalism — — -

the king’s favor. The rolling system, the judgmental system, the law system was under the king. Even, over the judgment system, the king’s interference proved that none of these three systems were free from the interference of the king.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Ideology of Napoleon Bonaparte and Capitalism — — — — — —

The pope was the catholic roman religious prime figure whose power of attorney came after the king of the Vatican City. The king and the catholic religious pope’s friendship prove how much the two higher classes were inter-connected with each other. The divine power of attorney of the king that support came from the pope. That maxim was established among the common people that both of themselves interconnectivity were the Christ’s destined, but, the protestant was hostile to their opinion and the protestant tried to come to light the real hidden scenario both of them, at the issue the two groups’ religious conflict soared up, and which eventually, the segregation between Christianity started and its outcomes as yet exists. Protestant religious groups wanted to capture the hypocrisy and conspiracy to render ahead of the bigoted common figures. In the holy Bible, nowhere is written or noted that God Christ has given the attorney power to both the king and the pope. Particularly, using religion they wanted to fulfill their own materialistic desires. and consumption. Therefore, 40% of the properties were of the church’s possession although no minimum contribution was in the production system; instead, they were the exploiters.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Ideology of Napoleon Bonaparte and Capitalism — — — — — — —

The chivalric ‘ social status were of the third position. They were the valor’s whose responsibilities were to protect the motherland, whose responsibilities were to protect the king and their king’s kingdom, and were to protect the clergy society, in exchange for it, they were supposed to be got lands, and for those properties’ the responsibilities of both maintenance and production system had been imposed upon the landless farmers and the slaves. Through the imposition of high amounts of taxation, the landless farmers and the slaves had been exploited by the knights. Particularly, the knights had to live in the small rural areas with fixed lands, and these lands were the tools of the exploitation by which the landless farmers and the salves had been discriminated against by the knights.

Bureaucracy, which is the addition of higher-educated persons: businessmen, members of the British Parliament, lawyers, urban property possessors, and the owners of the lands. But the worst conditions were in landless farmers’ cases, who were the exploited figures. Production tax and religious tax they had to give. But, the above-stated two classes (the clergy and the knights) were free from these kinds of taxation pressures, so, one kind of resentment accumulated in the oppressed group of minds, which is why the farmers’ movement came forward to reduce these kinds of oppression forever. The entire process was centered on land possession. The whole system was based on land, and so, on the basis of land, the socio-economic-political system expands. In other words, economic and political power are based on land. It is a kind of rolling structure whose basis is land. On the basis of condition, the possessors give lands to the land lenders, and the land lenders are known as the most exploited class. Particularly centered on production management, the socio-economic-political system extends up to 11, 12, and 13 centuries ago, this system was inaugurated; after that, the system was lost, and the inauguration of capitalism set out its journey up to the present. “The capitalists” economic system was introduced into the world’s economic history through the French Revolution.

From the 9th century up to the 15th century, the feudal system was set up. Centered on the land management system and the production system, the feudal system was made up of the European continent’s affiliated countries. Also, centered on the land and production system, social, economic, and political activities were led. Socio-economic-political power: all these kinds of authorities were conducted, and those were the conductors known as chivalric authoritative bodies upon whom the canter authoritative bodies were dependent. However, their settlements centered on small regions. Those tertiaries were in their possession, known as manors. Those who are under these manors are farmers.

Those are free farmers; they used to work a lot of time in the production, destined by the knights, who are chivalric and whose responsibility had been defense for the clergy and the king.

Those who had no land used to work all day long without minimum rest, with high imposed taxes. Those who were slaves’ conditions were more severe than others.

The bureaucracies are populated by educated figures whose professions are business- and educational-sector-based. Almost all of them are businessmen, lawyers, members of the British Parliament, educators, and urban property possessors. During the 15th century, the feudalist and feudalism-based ruling-legitimate-judicial systems became alterable, and the novel economic system set out on its journey through the French Revolution.

How did the French Revolution gain popularity and disheartening futurism? And how was futurism hindered by the French Revolution? What kinds of ideologies were in the French Revolution, and which absences were in the feudal ideologies?

The feudalism system was restricted for humanities, freedom, liberty, equity, universality, discrimination, human rights violations, labor wages, and slavery discrimination. Centered on the production system, ruling-judicial-law systems were dynamical, where aristocratic practices were done in these three sectors where the practices of iniquities and inhumanities, the lack of freedom and liberty, and the absence of the national senses had occurred.

On the other hand, the French revolutions were humanism, freedom, and sense of equity-based; from this point of view, it is distinct how much loftier the French revolution can be than feudalism.

However, the question is by whose hand French revolution come from? What background was behind the French revolution? What are the purposes of the French revolution? What kinds of changes were brought in the case of a novel socio-economic-political background?

Napoleon dreamed such a kind of dream through the French’s construction iniquity-injustice-discrimination free. This ideology became popular at that time, and consequently, all over Europe the ideology disseminated and accepted highly.

However, this ideology talks about equity, freedom, basic and human rights, humanism, national sense, and freedom from discrimination. And if these ideology’s applications remain in the three sectors thoroughly, the rule-law-judicial systems will continue well. Napoleon said such a kind of ruling system at which both sides equally play a role simultaneously whichever groups they belong. As, Napoléon ideology believes in equity, freedom, universality, from this point of view, it proves that everyone is equal to this ideology. The judicial system of the Napoleon’s ideology proves that in the judicial system, the king’s interference is unacceptable.

Through the French revolution, the novel economic system gained popularity throughout the European countries known as a capitalist economy. But, the novel economical system was not similar to the ideology of Napoléon. Napoleon fancy was such a kind of socio-economic-political managements where discrimination, inequity, injustice, human rights violation, separation, class distinction, labor-wages discrimination would not have existed. Everywhere peace and harmony were supposed to exist. But the new-existing economical management was totally dissimilar to the ideology of Napoleon.

The capitalist economy is such a kind of economy which intensifies class-distinction or class-division, the exploitation of labor and wage, the iniquity in both income and cost, the iniquity of consumption.

The ideology of the French revolution and the capitalist free market is controversial to each other.

The capitalist economy is such an economic management where a few numbers of people’s hands’ all properties, a few numbers of the capitalists have the full access in the cases of production, allotment, exchange and consumption, the full freedom a few numbers of the capitalists in the access of lands, labors, capital, and organization.

Feudalism system was an agricultural based production system which is why the advanced mechanisms’ deficiency was during that period, and so, the landless farmers and slaves had to give too much time, and that strategic sign was an exploitation towards the landless farmers and the slaves. On the other hand, industrial revolution brought the modern mechanisms based, inspired by the ideology of the greatest French king Napoleon before his sitting on the highest position.

But the sorrowful fact is, like feudal economic system, the industrial economic system had retained class distinction or class division.

The possession of all property was of a few numbers of the industrialists. In the investment sector, they had expensed their capital with a risk of organization for more and more production.

For this process’ completion, purchasing man-power at a lower rate, purchasing man-labor and wage at a lower rate is another discriminatory sign which presence was both during the feudal system and the capitalist system. And so, a distinctive similarity does exist in both cases of feudalism and capitalism, as a matter of fact. The ideology of Napoléon was nominally, but no pragmatic example’s implementation is rarely visible.

Like Feudal agricultural society, the industrial society was divided into class distinction. As like as feudal agricultural society, the industrial society’s properties ownership was accumulated by theirs hands, the tools of the exploitation were of their high amounts of capitals which investments were in versatile sectors in exchange for purchasing lower wages. On the scale of the variation of both income and expense, class divisions soared up between the capitalists and the industrial workers. Where nominal wages of the industrial labors were destined by the owners of industries, it was very complicated for them to live with standard with the fulfillment of basic human needs. In the cases of both the landless and the slaves’ society during the time of the feudalism, and the workers of the industrialism, the same condition’s repentance took place, and so, from this perspective, does the dissimilarity have between the ideology of Napoleon and the ideology of capitalism?

Like Feudal agricultural society, the industrial society was divided into class distinctions. Like as feudal agricultural society, the industrial society’s properties ownership was accumulated by their hands, the tools of the exploitation were of their high amounts of capital which investments were in versatile sectors in exchange for purchasing lower wages. On the scale of the variation of both income and expense, class divisions soared up between the capitalists and the industrial workers. Where nominal wages of the industrial laborers were destined by the owners of industries towards the workers, it was very complicated for them to live with standard with the fulfillment of basic human needs. In the cases of both the landless and the slaves’ society during the time of the feudalism, and the workers of industrialism, the same condition’s repentance took place, and so, from this perspective, does the dissimilarity have between the ideology of Napoleon and the ideology of capitalism? Both the clues of Napoleon’s ideology and the ideology of capitalism are bound equally. Napoleon promoted the idea of capitalism. In lieu of the reduction of iniquity, injustice, slavery exploited attitude, class distinction, labor exploitation, the reduction of the social-economic discrimination, equally it arose both in the feudal and the capitalist society.

Like the feudal based agricultural society’s workers, the industrial society’s workers’ living standard, per capita income, the fulfillment of basic needs, other crucial facilities, social and economic position were nominally, but, the privileged classes (during the feudalists and during the industrialists) consumed all those kinds of facilities through the exploitation process. Hence, there was no similarity between the ideology and the ideology in the case of both feudalism and capitalism.

In capitalism, man power with new mechanisms, on the other hands, the capitalists’ high amount of capitals’ investments in the different probable profitable sectors in exchange for purchasing labors and man-powers at a lower rate, the wistfully maximum amount of capital and profits were of the capitalists’ hands. Likewise, during the feudalist’s times, in exchange for cheap labors and wages, the landless and the slaves had to work hard all the day long, but no minimum wage honors they had to give, instead, various kinds of taxes were imposed upon them.

During the feudal system’s continuation, in the socio-economic-political system-based production management, even, during the capital system’s continuity, in the socio-economic-political system based global management, class distinction and exploitation, labor and wages discrimination and exploitation, income-based discrimination, inequality in allotment, so, how are the ideology of Napoleon and the ideology of the post-French revolution susceptible? During the feudal period and during the capitalist period, the activation of the economic activities was run relatively the same way which is why the aftermaths of both feudal economic system and the capitalist economic system are so many. Capital-based globally acknowledged economic systems, labor and wage discrimination is not a new thing.

On the whole, kingdom, feudalism, and capitalism all of those features are relatively the same. When monarchism existed, socio-political-economical discrimination existed. At that time, the major’s main characteristics were present on which basis, it was measured that class discrimination towards the lower classes’ people had had. Likewise, when both feudalism and capitalism existed at that time by those discriminatory factors labor and wage-based discrimination were measured through the pragmatic illustration upon the changeable society.

From the above stated diagrams prove that Napoleon’s ideology reposed for a less time because at that time feudalism based discriminatory characteristics were being dissuaded by the exploited classes.

From monarchism to feudalism, from feudalism to capitalism, unchangeable characteristics of class-distinctions, class-division, labor and wage based discriminatory characteristics from the worlds society did never change now or never. Only revolution has come, and new idealism soars up, and thinking. based changes have come and reformation have been taken place, but nominally the discriminatory have been reformed.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -