Why Uganda Cannot Agree on What Hurts
Uganda, What Is Our Collective Hunger or Pride? We Need to Find Our National Pain. What Unites Us?
Why Uganda Cannot Agree on What Hurts

I didn’t publish last Thursday because the piece I had written came from a very raw place. It was fueled by the frustration and emotional hangover of the recent elections, and while everything in it was honest, it wasn’t as objective as I wanted it to be.
That article was about our addiction to performance. Our love for optics over outcomes. The way we protest, post, pray, and trend and then call that resistance. It questioned online activism, diaspora protests, public solidarity, and the comfort we have built around “being seen” doing something instead of actually “doing” something.
I sat with it for a few days and shared it privately with some of you, my readers. It wasn’t as objective or as deliberate as my writing usually is. So, I didn’t publish it.
Today, I return with a calmer mind and a tighter grip on a different point I’m trying to make.
So here we go…
Ugandans are not short of opinions. We have them in bars, at the office, in taxis (even on bodabodas where you can barely hear each other), on X and WhatsApp groups, at family lunches, in church, and especially after an election cycle.
We argue loudly (most times we honestly just shout), confidently, and often incorrectly. But beneath all that noise is a far more uncomfortable conversation we keep postponing: we do not agree on what hurts us together. We do not have a national pain.
We have a flag we salute on public holidays, an anthem most of us mumble through, a passport that struggles at borders, and a currency that buys less bread every quarter. But do we have a shared wound? A collective hunger? Or even a common pride that doesn’t collapse the moment you interrogate it?
See!
Nations are not built by borders alone. They are built by shared culture, shared wounds, and shared dreams. And right now, Uganda feels like a country that skipped the group therapy session and decided to “manage” its trauma instead.
Our problem is not that we suffer.
As Thucydides put it long ago, the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.
The problem is that we have perfected suffering. We suffer privately, competitively, and in silos. My suffering versus yours. Kampala suffering versus village suffering. Public sector suffering versus private hustle suffering. Youth suffering versus “you young people don’t want to work” suffering.
Everyone is in pain, but no one wants to agree on which pain cuts across all of us, regardless of class, tribe, or proximity to power.
Our “leaders?” They do what they can and we… suffer what we must.
Ask ten Ugandans what our biggest problem is and you will get twelve answers plus a conspiracy theory.
Someone recently explained to me, with a straight face, how Museveni and Bobi Wine are secret besties who share beers in the dark and fight in public. That everything is a political mind game. These conspiracy theories are not intelligence or stupidity, they are coping mechanisms for something that makes absolutely no sense. Trauma response if you will. They are what happens when people feel powerless and need to believe nothing is real.
Corruption. Tribalism. Unemployment. Bad roads. Internet shutdowns. Poor healthcare. Poor education. The cost of fuel. The cost of living. The cost of breathing. Leadership. Followership. Witchcraft. NGOs. The West. The East. Social media. Museveni. Bobi Wine. The opposition. The opposition to the opposition.
We are united only by our disunity. And maybe that is the first honest national diagnosis we need to confront.
Observe!
Other nations, especially on this continent, have had defining pains that forced them to confront themselves without filters. South Africa had apartheid. Rwanda had genocide. Tunisia had the cost of living and state suffocation that ignited the Jasmine Revolution. Burkina Faso reached a point where insecurity and failed leadership became a national scream, not a partisan complaint.
These were horrors, yes. But they were also undeniable mirrors. Pain so loud it could not be postponed, explained away, or selectively applied. Pain that cut across class, tribe, and ideology. And because of that, it gave those nations direction. A shared enemy. A common goal.
Uganda, on the other hand, has mastered the art of manageable pain. Pain that is constant but never quite catastrophic enough to force change. Pain that allows survival but discourages dignity. Pain that exhausts you just enough to stop you from dreaming too far ahead.
We queue at public offices like it’s a cultural activity. We joke about hospitals killing patients. We normalize election violence, internet blackouts, corruption scandals, inflation, senseless traffic jams, poor infrastructure and police brutality with memes. We clap when a road is built like it’s a personal favour from government, not a basic taxpayer obligation. We survive so well that we forget to demand better.
Wait… wait a minute! hmm hmmm (i laugh with resigned amusement)
And this is where the NRM thrives.
**I laugh again! **(Defeated, really!)
That is the strategic genius of the NRM and its entire operation. If they can keep you barely surviving, the cost of starting over becomes too high. You are not comfortable enough to demand more, but not desperate enough to risk everything. So, you keep going.
It is like agreeing to go mountain climbing with your outdoorsy friends. Halfway up, your body is exhausted, your legs are shaking, and every instinct tells you to stop. You want to turn back. But the cost of descending alone, through thick jungle, unfamiliar paths, and real danger is far greater than the pain of continuing with the group. So, you summon whatever energy you have left and keep climbing, convincing yourself that maybe, just maybe, it will get better.
That is exactly where we are with this government.
The cost of revolution feels too high, and that is the saddest part, not because change is impossible, but because it exposes how little collective certainty we have as a people. We do not trust the very systems that led us here to guide us back if we have to rebuild from scratch. Everyone has had to forge their own path through the chaos. There is no clear roadmap, no safety net, no shared confidence that starting over will not destroy what little we have.
Many of us are where we are not because the system worked, but because of luck, timing, resilience, and the sheer grace of God. And when survival feels that fragile, endurance starts to look like wisdom even when it is quietly costing us everything.
Damn… how about that?
You know!
The NRM is not just a political party. It is a system. It controls the army, an army that began as a National Resistance Army (NRA) rebel force before becoming a national one. It controls Parliament. It controls ministries. It controls the security apparatus, the electoral process, the rules of the game, and often the referee himself.
This is not a fair playing field, and it has never been one. It never will be.
So, the idea that all we need is a more relentless opposition leader is comforting but naive. You cannot out-run a system that owns the road, the traffic lights, and the police checkpoints. You cannot simply “vote harder” against a structure that has embedded itself into every organ of the state.
That is why personality politics alone will not liberate Uganda.
Liberation requires something more dangerous to power than an opposition figure. It requires a shared national hunger. A pain so widely felt and so clearly named that even the beneficiaries of the system cannot pretend they are immune to it.
Look!
Even the corrupt, even the connected, even the beneficiaries of this rotten system are trapped inside it. They may eat better, but they still queue at the same broken offices. They still rely on the same failing hospitals in emergencies. They still raise children in a country with shrinking opportunity. They still drive their luxurious cars on the same broken roads… they still live under the same uncertainty.
Our hunger is not just for food. It is for fairness. For systems that work even when you don’t know someone. For institutions that don’t collapse the moment integrity walks in. For leadership that does not require praise singers, fear, or violence to function.
But we don’t agree on that hunger either.
Some of us are hungry for change. Some are hungry for stability. Some are hungry for power. Some are hungry to be left alone. And many are hungry for a seat at the same table they loudly claim is broken — just look at the MPs we keep sending to Parliament.
Our pride, too, is confused. We are on different pages, arguing about different books.
We are proud of our hospitality, yet hostile to dissent. Proud of our resilience, yet allergic to accountability. Proud of our peace, yet terrified of honest conversations. Proud of our culture, yet quick to weaponize tribe when it benefits us.
We say “Ugandans are hardworking,” but reward proximity over performance. We say “we are peaceful,” but confuse silence for consent. We say “this country has potential,” as if potential is a tangible national export. In Uganda potential is not pride. Potential is procrastination with really good branding.
What truly unites us, if we are being brutally honest, is not love for Uganda, it is FEAR.
Fear of instability. Fear of starting over. Fear of losing the little we have managed to secure in a system with no clear rules. Fear of asking hard questions whose answers might implicate us too or get us in trouble. And that fear keeps the ceremonial cycle alive. Election after election. Promises after promises. Same outcomes, new slogans.
National pain is not just about what leaders do to citizens. It is also about what citizens tolerate, excuse, rationalize, and participate in. Our collective pain may simply be this: we do not trust each other enough to demand better together.
We don’t trust institutions. We don’t trust leaders. We don’t trust systems. And increasingly, we don’t trust fellow citizens because everyone seems to have a hidden agenda.
So?
We retreat.
Into tribes. Into churches. Into parties. Into hustle circles. Into WhatsApp groups. Into gated thinking. Every man for himself. Every family for its own. Every generation blaming the other. We retreat into smaller groups that try to work around our shared pain.
If we are ever going to break the NRM’s ceremonial grip on this country, it will not be through slogans, hashtags, or election seasons alone. It will happen when we finally agree that this country hurts us in similar ways, even if it hurts us differently.
When a bodaboda rider, a banker, a teacher, a soldier, a farmer, and a civil servant can sit in the same conversation and admit that the system is not working for most of us, not just for me. That is when national pain becomes national duty. That is when hunger becomes purpose. That is when liberation stops being a campaign promise and becomes a collective demand.
Until then, we will keep arguing loudly or shouting, suffering quietly, and protecting the small individual gains we have carved out of a broken system.
Right now, Uganda is hungry. But before we wash our hands and sit at the table, we must first agree on what we are hungry for.
Thank you for reading.
메타데이터
- post_id
- 92667d7bd7ca
- slug
- why-uganda-cannot-agree-on-what-hurts-92667d7bd7ca
- url
- https://medium.com/@ianpaul2506/why-uganda-cannot-agree-on-what-hurts-92667d7bd7ca
- canonical_url
- https://medium.com/@ianpaul2506/why-uganda-cannot-agree-on-what-hurts-92667d7bd7ca
- author_url
- https://medium.com/@ianpaul2506
- status
- ok
- fetched_at
- 2026-06-13 07:35:29