Cash for Chaos: How Jan. 6 Became a Payday

Trump sued himself, settled with himself, and unlocked $1.8 billion — for the people who stormed the Capitol

Image created by the author using AI

Robert Gieswein wore a camouflage paramilitary kit and carried a baseball bat when he marched toward the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. He sprayed aerosol irritant into the eyes of three police officers, climbed through a broken window frame, and threw a punch at a cop who was trying to arrest someone else. A federal judge sentenced him to four years in prison. Today, Gieswein is not in a cell. He is sitting in a living room in Colorado, calculating his payout from a $1.776 billion fund created by the very man whose name the mob chanted that day — and he thinks $3 million would be his “fair share.”

This is not a dystopian novel. This is the United States of America in 2026, where a president who pardoned the people who tried to overturn his election has now built them a compensation pipeline. And the most chilling part? He didn’t even have to ask Congress.

The anatomy of an unprecedented act

Trump sued the executive branch that he himself oversees — an unprecedented legal move, experts said. He, his sons, and the Trump Organization filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax returns, made additional claims about the search of his Florida home, and used that leverage to birth the fund.

Pause on the constitutional architecture of that maneuver. A sitting president — the head of the executive branch — filed suit against his own government, then settled with himself, then used that self-settlement to unlock $1.776 billion in public money, all without a single vote in Congress.

Normally, Congress decides how public money is spent. The Judgment Fund is an exception — a permanent pool of money the government uses to pay legal judgments and settlements without needing a new vote each time. The lawsuit charges that the administration abused this exception by tapping the Judgment Fund to finance the Anti-Weaponization Fund, effectively dodging Congress’s approval and violating its constitutional authority over appropriations.

This is not legal creativity. This is legal alchemy — transmuting a personal grievance into a public slush fund.

The queue forms quickly

Less than a week after the Justice Department announced the fund, Jan. 6 defendants and allies of President Trump were already lining up to seek their share of the unprecedented compensation.

Peter Ticktin, a Florida-based attorney who has worked with hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants, said he believes approximately 400 of his clients will stake a claim. “I’m anticipating that the process is to develop some kind of a scale depending on the degrees of severity,” he said, noting that many clients have lost jobs, businesses, and reputations.

Others interested in potentially applying include former Michigan elector Meshawn Maddock, as well as conservative attorney John Eastman, who helped devise the so-called fake elector plot. The fake elector plot was a scheme to overturn a certified presidential election. Now, participating in that scheme may qualify someone for taxpayer-funded compensation. We are in a surreal reality where the people who tried to subvert the Constitution could receive government payouts.

Months before the $1.8 billion fund was even announced, a Trump DOJ official predicted Capitol rioters would get millions, even if it took until 2028. This was not improvisation. This was a plan.

The spoils system, rebranded

In 1883, Congress passed the Pendleton Act to end the spoils system — the practice of rewarding political loyalty with government jobs and contracts. The reformers understood something fundamental: when a president can use the power of the state to enrich his allies and punish his enemies, the republic itself becomes a hostage.

We are watching that understanding unravel in real time. The Anti-Weaponization Fund is the spoils system rebranded for the 21st century. Instead of patronage jobs, it offers cash payouts. Instead of party loyalists, it rewards insurrectionists. The mechanism is identical: I did your bidding, now pay me.

And the man running it is the human embodiment of the revolving door. Now Blanche sits in the attorney general’s chair, overseeing a fund that could pay out eight-figure settlements to the people who stormed the building he now occupies.

Compare this to the only precedent the administration cites — Obama’s $760 million fund for Black farmers discriminated against by the USDA. That fund had congressional authorization, bipartisan support, actual victims with documented harm, and a claims process with judicial review. The Anti-Weaponization Fund has none of these. It has Todd Blanche’s signature and a promise.

This is recruitment

There is a word for what this fund does, and it is not “compensation.” It is recruitment.

Every January 6 defendant who files a claim, every Proud Boys lieutenant who sues for millions, every rioter who tells a reporter he wants his “fair share” — they are all sending the same signal to every disgruntled, radicalized, armed American who might be watching: the president is hiring. The pay is extraordinary. The risk is zero, because he will pardon you first and pay you second.

Senator Thom Tillis called the fund “stupid on stilts.” He is wrong. It is not stupid. It is the most calculated thing Trump has done since returning to power. The White House ballroom grandstands to his base. The tariff wars distract from his failures. But this fund? This fund is a loyalty test, a recruitment tool, and a middle finger to every officer who bled on the Capitol steps — all wrapped in the language of victimhood.

Trump is not asking whether you were prosecuted unfairly. He is asking whether you attacked the Capitol for him. If yes, the fund is open. If no, you are not a victim — you are a mark.

The officers who still carry their scars

On January 6, 2021, Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges was pinned against a door at the Capitol tunnel entrance. Videos captured a rioter ripping a mask off Hodges as he was trapped in a fight for control of the tunnel. He survived. He testified before Congress. He has spent the years since watching the men who attacked him be pardoned, celebrated, and now — potentially — financially compensated by the very government he serves.

Hodges and former Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn filed suit in federal court in the District of Columbia, asking a judge to find the creation of the fund illegal and reverse any Treasury transfers made to implement it. Their lawsuit cuts to the moral core of what is happening: the officers claim the fund “encourages those who enacted violence in the President’s name to continue to do so.”

Officer Hodges put it even more directly. “If they get this payout, then they’ll have significant financial resources and they have no ethical qualms about it, so what would stop them from carrying out any more violence?” he said.

This is not a legal abstraction. This is a police officer, still in uniform, asking the country whether violence will be punished or rewarded. The question deserves an answer.

A reckoning with history

History is rarely kind to nations that reward the breakers of their own foundations. But history does offer instructive parallels — and they are not encouraging.

After the Beer Hall Putsch of 1923, Adolf Hitler served a laughably short prison sentence before his movement was effectively legitimized by mainstream German politicians who believed they could control him. The lesson history repeatedly teaches is this: when a state signals that political violence carries no lasting consequence — and may even generate reward — it does not deter future violence. It prices it.

America is not Weimar Germany. But the structural principle is disturbingly transferable. The mere possibility that violent rioters could be considered for payouts is consistent with a Trump administration pattern of rewriting the dark history of Jan. 6 — a trend that began when the president pardoned participants and continued with the Justice Department, firing some prosecutors who put them behind bars.

Consider the full arc: Trump granted clemency to every Jan. 6 defendant, including full pardons for the most violent rioters and the erasure of seditious conspiracy convictions for members of extremist groups. The Justice Department fired dozens of prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases and hired a former riot defendant who was seen on video urging the mob to “kill” police.

Then came the erasure of the historical record itself: on the fifth anniversary of the riot, the White House created a website describing the rioters as “patriots” and blaming police for causing “chaos.” Last week, the administration announced the $1.8 billion fund, indicating that even rioters who assaulted police may be eligible for payouts.

Pardon. Rehabilitate. Compensate. Celebrate. This is not a legal process. This is a political theology — and the Anti-Weaponization Fund is its most expensive sacrament yet.

Political violence is now cheaper than ever

We are living inside a constitutional moment that most Americans have not yet recognized as such — because constitutional moments rarely announce themselves with trumpets. They arrive dressed in bureaucratic language, legal filings, and budget hearings. They look boring. They look procedural. They look like news that can be scrolled past.

Do not scroll past this one.

The fund represents not only a highly unorthodox resolution but also a further demonstration of the administration’s eagerness to reward allies who before Trump came to power were investigated and in some cases charged and convicted.

What happens to a democracy when the government abandons its role as a neutral enforcer of the law and instead financially rewards the very people who tried to overthrow it? When the sentence for attacking the Capitol is not imprisonment but a settlement check? When the men and women who defended that building are forced to sue their own government to stop it from paying their attackers?

The answer, historically speaking, is not good. Political violence becomes cheaper. Institutional trust collapses further. The next group that contemplates storming a government building will have learned a precise and actionable lesson: that in this America, the state does not punish insurrection. It reimburses it.

Officer Daniel Hodges was pinned against a door. A rioter ripped the mask from his face. He fought. He survived. He testified. And now he has to sue his own government to make sure the man who attacked him doesn’t get a check.

If that is not the story of where America stands in 2026 — the full, unvarnished, civilization-level weight of it — then we are not paying attention. And not paying attention, at precisely this moment in history, is a choice with consequences none of us can fully afford.

The republic is not lost. But it is, at this hour, for sale. The price, apparently, is $1.776 billion — and the currency is amnesia.