Technology & the American Consumer — COMMONWEALTH DATA, DATA ESPIONAGE, DATA BROKERING, MISUSE OF FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS BY ANTISOCIAL, GREED DRIVEN BIG TECH AMERICAN EXECUTIVE.

— -

Oct 18, 2024, 12:27 PM (10 days ago)

from:Trenton Garmon

to:protector@consultant.com, gazette@columnist.com cc:Brandon Moseley, gfile@usa.com bcc: 400WL AI undercurrent surge,

b22@consultant.com, @un.org, @un.org, @un.org, @un.org, @un.org,

—

OpenAI was a backdoor to American Data with the alternative agenda of Sam Altman. So say his former friends who just happen to have been executives with OpenAI. This has serious, if properly considered, even criminal implications. Let us not pretend with his smirky grin. For clarity, Musk has done much of the same. Had the “latest & greatest” only to need Big Gov grants — or our tax payer incentives up to $7k per vehicle — to pay for it. So we the people invest our tax payer dollars in “grants” to purported Entrepreneurs in a ‘free market” economy — they over shoot this number or good faith inflate that one — and WAM. This nobody regular business man has manipulated the Big Gov using grants like air balloons ready to deflate after the taxpayer ride is provided. So no — the pattern is absurd. We are either free market and “we the people” own a piece of these corporations or they are abusing the process.

From Bezos stating on Jay Leno this massive overvaluation intentionally — then obtaining funding — grants — good will — all to become a billionaire in building what was already available to people in essence — only a slightly better way to do it. Now we have Elon Musk using tax payer dollars in the billions to basically led NASA investments for his own company — SpaceX. The hog is skinned and the pork rines bag is empty. Sam, Elon and Jeff — those are the guys pretending to be smarter and more important than they are. Extorters of Grants for free market ventures.

But I digress. And I will pray for them — given clearly their act and the reasonable degree of “charisma”, rooted in truth or false light, has so far worked. Truth be told as a fanatic for process — if assigned — and given open Legal Discovery I believe a fraud case could be built against each one of them regarding government funding and the veracity of the numbers provided. With Altman — it is inflated numbers to obtain grants and loans — then literally selling of data with multiple counts of soliciting espionage money for data. In your face mockery of Americans rights. Here’s they why and how.

The information crawled online is either commonwealth or owned by the individual. There is no in between. Yes, by category a Government Agency may “store” the data and info — surely we all know that. Which then triggers certain duties of privacy and care with regards to how the data/information is store. Thus, in an academic setting — as stated over and over again Data or the Corpus of Data is our property — not that of Corporate America. Which also carries with it certain “private corporate duties” as would any individual who is provide or obtain information.

One cannot simply find a stack of medical records in a hospital dumpster and expect to legally sell that information on the open market hidden behind the name of a corporation. And no corporation should escape the same culpability and liability for providing Data or Info in a citizen to a foreign nation which may use same in leveraging against the nation of that citizen. That is Data Espionage. And Sam Altman has committed it over and over. That’s what his company’s former executives and employees are telling us. Gray squirrel smiles and all — he is selling or brokering American Data to foreign nations.

All under the guise of some new Artificial Intelligence. Bull, bogus, bologna. The Data itself is being sold back to Americans via banner ads, Gov grants these AI companies obtain and the like to build out Large Language Models which provide rolling string codes of information and data. That is not new per se and even when advancements are made in how much data can be stored, the speed of the retrieval process and how via screens and or audio same is disseminated — it remains true and certain. OpenAI has used our commonwealth data — sold it back to us — used Big Gov grants to develop their purported new AI tech and at the same time — then Data Brokered to the foreign nations — so say their own executives.

So while Eric Snowden take a moral step in asking the authority of the nation to keep the Constitutional minimums; Sam Altman uses cheesy smiles, vain promises, humblebrag nonsense and Data Broker or Data Espionages the information of American Citizens. Not maybe — his own people are saying it and we are watching it like a bad dream or some surreal experience of mice playing men with atomic weapons of misinformation. Please bring restrain to the Big Tech industry in America and hold Data Brokers accountable for sales to foreign nations and foreign corporations wherein same compromises American sovereignty, Consumer’s rights of privacy and are the by-product of deceptive “form” permissions. All after much of our own tax payer dollars are given in grants directly or indirectly to those web crawling over our every trip to a CVS, Publix or the local Starbucks, as well as associations.

The Data Brokering partnerships among American Big Tech companies and the interplay with Consumer Rights and Foreign Nation sales must continue to remain top of mind with special assigned prosecutors and commissions. God gave us intimacy among other humans by natural law witness in the human family and in the privacy of fellowship among friends. It is the odd, antisocial and even nefarious few Billionaire Elites — who climbed the grant & aristocratic venture ladder — many times as did Altman — illegally and unethically.

“In a new interview, a former OpenAI employee made a striking claim about his ex-employer’s plans for artificial general intelligence (AGI) — or, more specifically, how to make a bunch of money off it. During a lengthy interview with tech podcaster Dwarkesh Patel, ex-OpenAI safety researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner claimed that he’d heard tell “from multiple people” that his erstwhile employer had, in years past, schemed to start a global AGI bidding war.” (https://futurism.com/the-byte/former-openai-employee-agi-bidding-war)

Americans are more than a Floppy Drive or USB Drive of Data or an Address for delivery of a product. These are the men who are dividing social structures and relationships — the antisocials pretending to be experts in commerce, tech, the economy and human thriving. Truly a sad situation to observe. Open a formal federal investigation of OpenAI and Sam Altman regarding Data Espionage and Data Brokering of American’s information to foreign nations. Hold American Big Tech responsible. Force accountability of our data as the LLMs are being “built out” and Data Sold off to highest foreign nation bidders. These guys know better. The green wool of greed has covered their eyes. REthink these matters Department of Justice, Congress and the next President. And get ready to Bring Eric Snowden Home. #dotheprocess

— — — — —

AMERICAN LANDS — ARE AMERICAN FARMS AND HUD FUNDED APARTMENTS A COMMONWEALTH OF CHINA?

The Vikings, history says during the Missippian era, had land in the US to include cities. The Cherokees, Creeks, Seminoles and others — had land in the US considered Tribal Lands what were “commonwealth” or a “Land Trust De Facto” being communal living. Then those lands became Deed and Boundary transferred to “Landowning Americans”, as well as County, State and Federal Government entities. Of course, some Plots of land are owned by Corporations or Land Trusts even today. Yet now the pattern of dirt ownership is shifting in a pattern of being sold to the Chinese again under a Communist Theory of Government.

The purchasing of U.S. Land by Chinese shell companies operating via filings with the various State Secretaries should be reviewed and mitigated. Not only is this against American interest, but it challenges the United State’s Sovereignty as a Nation. China is not only buying up “farms”, but is creating Shell Corporations to purchase large Flats and Apartment Complexes. Meaning the Bank of China like Monopoly is buying up America’s farmland and our Tax Payer Funded Monthly Investment called Flats or Apartments. You are seeing sections of the nation become owned by Communist China. With liberal “body counts” of tenants that represent the U.S Tax Payer funding the Government with Taxes, then the Big Gov sending via HUD a Section 8 check to a State Corporation which is a Shell of the Bank of China. Not maybe, but case study and discovery confirmed in many states to include Alabama. In example: 745 Walnut, LLC — Alabama shell corporation owned by the Chinese which receives Section 8 Housing money/funds from the Government to house U.S. Citizens. This type legal situation must have much policy consideration and forethought.

— — — — —

SOFT POWER IN OBJECTIVE CONTEXT — Kamala’s Point with Brett — Is Trump now a Professional Politician?

Please stop the madness. She was trying to offer a point of discussion. But the interpretation of the exchange slanted against Kamala without any consideration of an exchanged talking point. So just because a competent, humble, well intended and person of good spirit gives an answer that a Radio Show Host or Journalist does not like — stop attacking good substance through scandal. That’s just a lack of integrity. Critique what she says, not when she says it — and do so from an objective policy, ethics and legal regard. And remember — there is an art to every profession. Rigid questions that have a line or scope offered — are not proper nor professional if one forces a “strict to the script” question and answer. To me the interview with Brett and Kamala felt more like a deposition.

Like any training regarding finessing out information there is a process, but the art remains charismatic. Good journalists in best practices make a mental note about Question J2 if offered response P1, by inquiring regarding P1 and then returning to J2 for discussion. Kamala was not afforded that opportunity — hence it felt like she was being deposed when talking with Brett. Sorry, love that guy and he’s typically solid, but that line of questioning felt almost like a flex session rather than a flow of policies and breathing life into her real “personality” for all of us to have personas. And these interviews have not merely a data session exchange intention, but the spirit of the matter is “who are you”? And here’s some subject matter to discuss. Thus her responses were suitable to an Executive Leader and should not be scandalized in ignorance of the process. No forward objective mind believes Kamala will make the exact same decisions as Joseph Biden has, nor is a VP for a Company responsible for the exclusive decisions of the President of the Company. So not sure why it is so confusing to give her breathing room about the distinctions. Emory *** described it as a “hostile news network” interview. (https://polisci.emory.edu/home/people/biography/gillespie-andra.html)

Context — Kamala asked about her performance while VP and comments about Trump receiving donations and offering policy ideas while not the actual President. Her point was that she’s the VP and she’s a part of the policy process. But to impute to her Biden’s platform and his decisions is unfair to the election process. Her point brought to light a question of professional politicians and was a valid one to make. What change can a VP actually have upon policy that is entrenched int eh mind of a President — very little. Is Trump ethically campaigning when raising money and pitching policies 1, 2, 3 years before the election? One may want to discuss that matter. I say, “Yes”. By law as I understand it Trump has the right to both comment and offer policy as well as continue to “Campaign” of sorts.

And yes — Kamala Harris has some responsibility for the policies that she supports which Biden has in place — and yet there must be a distinction opportunity for her to discuss her ideas without being scandalized and otherwise ignored in that particular or even peculiar policy discussion. She has the right to not inherit the policy of Biden from which she can distinguish herself. Yet over and over again on honkie radio and in pretend media they are busting her balls and not allowing her to play fair ball. Journalism is like ping-pong with clear basic rules so the exchange can be observed. A key in jury trials is to be as gentle as possible while remaining firm in the line and scope of questioning. Because one offensive question to a lady — jury gets flipped. In the real world, there was a Med Mal case in my firm referred to the speciality trial firm at the time — and a young trial lawyer (EH) questioning of a Malpracticing Medical Doctor felt so very forced. And then, the jury found against our lady. I did not try that case, but I could feel it when two ladies on the jury shifted in their seats offended at how forceful he was in one particular line of questioning. It truly is a similar delicate balance in Journalism. In that case it was a Hung Jury — and yes — the one lady upon jury pooling had spoken up against our side — leading to the gridlock. It was in the atmosphere — truth be told his dad has the charisma and even his response to the line of his son’s questioning appeared concerned. The “it just felt right” in spirit and truth was not there.

Let Kamala speak plainly and from the heart. Then judge the policies. Kamala is not Joseph Biden, again yet responsible for her specific duties as VP while politics are supposed to support a “polite rebuke” even within one’s own party of how an individual handled a duty above or below us in rank. That is civilized, ethical government facilitated by “we the people” in the securing of natural law and civil rights of “life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness” via the recognition and execution upon the methods vetted out over time in statutes and case law. Any policy not conforming to those branches of prudence will be ineffective and eventually die on the vine. Good policies appear like ripe fruit and fall into the hand, sweet and juicy — full of nutrition and natural law sense. Otherwise is VP Vance going to be responsible for every decision of President Trump? We think not. Let’s give our best objective consideration of the matters of principles with graces afforded in the flow(s) of life. Choose wisely.

— — — — —

Execution of Texas Inmate — Delayed.

This is the direct response it seems to quality Journalism and the speaking up of an Investigator, turned Pastor who stayed the course. Good work to all the major outlets which provided coverage.

— — — — —

MOSES: CENTER OR SIDELINE? Col. John Eidsmoe | Oct 01, 2024 — The Next U.S. President Must Reform & Restore Order with the profound simplicities of the Supreme Law of the Land.

The east pediment of the U.S. Supreme Court building features Solon of Athens as a western lawgiver and Confucius of China as an eastern lawgiver. But In the center between them, taller seated than Solon and Confucius standing, is Moses holding the Ten Commandments — a recognition that the Decalogue is the moral foundation of law.

The basic principles of our legal system are found in the Ten Commandments:

• Respect for life, found in the commandment “Thou shalt not kill” and in our homicide and wrongful death laws.

• Respect for property, found in the commandment “Thou shalt not steal” and in our property and theft laws.

• Respect for family, found in the commandments “Honor thy father and thy mother” and “Thou shalt not commit adultery” and in our laws and court decisions protecting the family as the basic unit of society.

• Respect for truth, found in the commandments “Thou shalt not bear false witness” and “Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain” and in our perjury laws.

• Respect for God, found in the commandment “Thou shalt have no other gods before me” and in the Declaration’s reference to “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” and the “unalienable rights” endowed by the Creator.

But how did these fundamental principles of law make their way from Mt. Sinai to the courtrooms and legislative chambers of today? Let us trace the connection.

As St. Patrick (5th century AD) evangelized Ireland, he carried with him copies of a Celtic law book Liber ex Lege Moisi (The Book of the Law of Moses) and gave them to the Brehon (Druid) judges.

When Alfred the Great drafted his Book of Dooms in AD 890, the first written law code to govern all England, he began it with the Ten Commandments and interspersed Bible reference throughout the code.

In medieval Europe, Rabbi Moses Bn Maimon (Maimonides, AD 1135–1204) took the Old Testament monetary laws and drafted them into a code that became the commercial code for much of Europe.

During and after the Renaissance, many European kings revied the old Roman concept of imperium and claimed for themselves absolute power. “L’Etat, c’est moi” (“I am the state”) is attributed to Louis XIV of France, supported by Thomas Hobbes’s support of the absolute state in his Leviathan.

But others feared absolute power and favored republican government — and they looked to the Bible, especially the Old Testament, for a defense of republicanism. One of these was John Selden (1584–1654), a member of the English Parliament and drafter of the Petition of Right. Selden was above all a Hebrew scholar whose writings included De Successionibus in Bona Secundum Leges Ebraeorum (1631), De Jure Naturali et Gentium Juxta Disciplinam Ebraeorum (1640) and others. These works on Hebrew Law, coupled with his studies of English legal history and English constitutionalism, set forth a Biblical basis for republican thought.

The Dutch scholar Patrus Cunaeus (1586–1638) penned The Hebrew Republic, not to be confused with another work by the same title by the Italian scholar Carlos Sigonius (1523–1594). Cunaeus declared in his preface,

“I ask you, illustrious Members of States, to study over and again the Hebrew Republic — the holiest and best of all — which I have described in this book. It contains ideas that kings, leaders, and the administrations of republics may adopt for their own use.”

The Calvinist law professor Johannes Althusius (c. 1557–1638) wrote the classic Politica, legal and theological justification for the Dutch secession from Spain and a grand design for federalism based on Scripture and natural law. His 1614 Preface stated,

“The precepts of the Decalogue are included to the extent that they infuse a vital spirit into the association and symbiotic life that we seek, and that they provide and constitute a way, rule, guiding star, and boundary for human society.”

Hugo Grotius (1583–1645) is often called the “father of international law.” Along with his classic The Rights [Law] of War and Peace, he published an early Protestant work of Christian apologetics, The Truth of the Christian Religion. In War and Peace he argued that international law cold be binding on both Christian and non-Christian nations because of their common understanding of natural law, but the Mosaic Law can be useful in understanding natural law because

…what it [the Law of Moses] enjoins is not contrary to the law of nature. For since the law of nature is perpetual and unchangeable, nothing contrary to it could be commanded by God, who is never unjust. Besides, the Law of Moses is called in the xix Psalm an undefiled and right law, and St. Paul, Romans Vii. 12, describes it to be holy, just, and good.

Sir William Blackstone (1723–1780), whose Commentaries on the Laws of England sold almost as many copies in America as in England, said all human law must be based upon the Law of Nature and the Revealed Law, which he said is found only in the Holy Scriptures. “Upon these two foundations,” he wrote, “the law of nature and the law of revelation depend all human laws, that is to say, no human law should be suffered to contradict these.”

So when we place the Ten Commandments in schools and courthouses, we are not inserting religion into government. We are simply restoring the Decalogue to its rightful place as the moral foundation of law.

Colonel Eidsmoe serves as Professor of Constitutional Law for the Oak Brook College of Law & Government Policy (obcl.edu) and as Senior Counsel for the Foundation for Moral Law (morallaw.org). He may be reached for speaking engagements at eidsmoeja@juno.com.

THE VIEWS OF SUBMITTED EDITORIALS MAY NOT BE THE EXPRESS VIEWS OF GFILE.

Attachments area

Preview YouTube video Leopold Aschenbrenner — 2027 AGI, China/US Super-Intelligence Race, & The Return of History