Recycling is Broken — Here is How to Fix It

Recycling is a term that hasn’t caught speed — at least not where I live. I don’t recycle, mainly because my apartment complex and city don’t ask for, promote, or encourage it. There are no mechanisms to make it easier for residents, even those who might actually want to try.

*👋🏼 Not a Medium member? *Click here to read the full article. Also, why don’t you consider signing up as there are so many good authors and articles to read and learn from. Plus, you reading as a member helps all us authors with our readership.🙂

In a developing country like India, sanitation and waste management are still nascent. We are still trying to educate people not to throw trash into empty lots, out of windows, or onto the road. We are way behind. I have neighbors who still behave like primitive cave-dwellers; our housing society has requested residents to segregate dry and wet waste for years, yet many on my floor alone simply refuse. If basic waste segregation isn’t a practice yet, you can’t expect “cave-people” to recycle, even if the infrastructure existed.

Created with Leonardo.ai

But recycling isn’t a new concept, and people ignoring it isn’t a new problem.

In the 1950s, the USA ran public campaigns encouraging people to recycle. In the 1970s, the plastic industry (backed by big oil) reignited these campaigns. You might think that’s a good thing, but it was a calculated move: the plastic industry shifted the burden of pollution from their shoulders to the consumer’s. This was the standard solution adopted by the rest of the world.

They made us feel that recycling is our duty. And while it is everyone’s duty, we rarely see the industry held accountable. Their campaigns worked perfectly — they made us feel responsible and guilty, while they stayed profitable.

I’m usually no fan of the government, but here I’ll defend it. Why should the cost of recycling propaganda and infrastructure be borne by the government? As an organization, it doesn’t produce, consume, or discard the majority of plastic. That’s done by manufacturers and us, the consumers.

Here is my simple solution to ensure recycling is done right:

1. Mandatory Education: Plastic manufacturers must budget for awareness and education campaigns as a fixed cost of doing business.
2. Industry-Funded Infrastructure: The industry must set up the recycling infrastructure. Most industries are required to dispose of their waste properly; why should bottle and bag manufacturers be exempt?
3. Strict Recovery Targets: Companies must be measured by the actual amount of plastic recovered and recycled. If they miss their targets, they face heavy penalties.
4. No Offsetting: Companies shouldn’t be allowed to “buy” their way out through credits.

What would this look like in practice?

I saw a video about how Germans carry their plastic bottles back to the supermarket and feed them into machines that give them credit. It’s brilliant. Big beverage companies should be forced to install these kiosks in convenient locations. If you drink a Coke, you return the bottle to a Coke machine. The company coughs up the incentive money.

This should apply to everything — boxes, jars, meal bentos. Industry-funded machines should be in every society, office complex, and park. Companies must be pressured to convince their users to use them because if they don’t, they pay. If a company sells 100 bottles a day, they should have to collect at least 80% back. If they fail, their profit for those 100 bottles is recovered by the government as a penalty.

Under this model, the government becomes a facilitator and mediator rather than a janitor using public funds. They might even collect additional revenue for the public good. Consumers are finally incentivized, and the manufacturers — the creators of the pollutant — are held responsible for the mess. No “Carbon Credit” style loopholes. If you fall short, you are penalized. If you exceed your quota, you’re just doing your job.

I reckon many companies will hate this. But I also reckon that this pressure will finally spark innovation. It will force them to find eco-friendly alternatives and solutions instead of staying complacent with the status quo.

I also acknowledge this sounds like a massive shock to the system. Critics will call it naive because, on day one, the economy takes a hit. Supply chains will have to be ripped apart and rebuilt. Companies will scream about “market instability,” and yes, we’ll likely see a temporary spike in the price of a bottle of water or a bag of chips.

For a middle-class family in a developing economy, every rupee matters. A sudden 10% or 15% “packaging surcharge” feels like a punch in the gut. There’s no point in sugar-coating it: the transition will be messy and expensive. It will be incredibly unpopular with the people currently making a killing off the status quo.

However, in countries with strong regulators, this price run-off can be kept in check. Regulators can ensure that the majority of this cost isn’t just dumped onto the consumer. By capping the hikes companies are allowed to make, the government forces the industry to eat the cost out of their own margins rather than passing the bill to the person buying a soda.

And we also have to look at what we are actually paying for right now. Currently, the “low cost” of plastic is a lie — we’re just deferring the payment. We pay for it in clogged urban drains that cause flash floods during every monsoon. We pay for it in public health crises caused by microplastics and toxic runoff. We pay for it through government municipal budgets that are flushed down the toilet trying to clean up a mess that grows faster than any broom can sweep. The short-term economic “loss” is really just us finally paying the invoice that the plastic industry has been hiding under the rug for seventy years.

In the long run, this isn’t just about “saving the planet” — it’s about economic survival. By forcing this shift, we create a massive new secondary industry in recovery and processing. We turn a waste stream into a resource stream. The “inconvenience” of lugging plastic back to a kiosk becomes a predictable part of the daily economy, and the initial price hikes eventually stabilize as innovation drives down the cost of sustainable packaging.

If we don’t stomach these short-term costs now, the long-term bill will be a world that is literally uninhabitable for anything other than the “cave-dwellers” and their trash. Companies will complain that this cuts into their margins, but if they can’t figure out how to be profitable without poisoning the well, then they don’t deserve to be in business. Their profits cannot and should not supersede the health of the only world we’ve got.

Authors like me rely on the kindness of strangers like you. If you enjoyed this article or learned something new, a few claps and a quick comment go a long way in keeping my spirit moving.

If you’re interested in how ancient strategy can help founders survive and thrive, you might enjoy my books, **A Startup Founder’s Guide to the Art of War and [Design a Better Business](https://www.amazon.in/dp/B0FTS4C5VZ)**. They are full of candid stories, field-tested advice, and practical lessons for anyone building something from scratch.

You’ll find more of my writing here too — feel free to explore when you’re ready.

Thanks again for reading. See you in the next one. 🤗❤️