Aging Is Driven By Internal Biological Clocks, Not Relativistic Space-Time.

Biological Time Is Independent of Space Time

Despite astrophysicists' hypothesis that time might not exist, human aging poses an insurmountable contradiction. The time references we use on Earth are not in sync with cosmological space-time theories. Humans' measurement of time is local. It uses Earth’s 24-hour daily revolution on its axis and its 365-day orbit around the Sun (1 year).

A problem is that time is neither dependent on nor even defined by the particular reference points humanity is using. A dilemma to consider is that humans’ solarcentric perception of time could create a stunted sense of reality.

The Solar System-based benchmarks that we use to measure time are the same ones we apply to aging. Humans are born, and every year when a birthday arrives, we add another year to our age. If we lived on a deep-space colony rather than a planet orbiting the Sun, we would not have the same perception of time. Nonetheless, we would age, and our lives would be similarly finite.

In a universe without time, how can we explain the process of human aging? The answer is that aging is controlled by our biological clocks and the gradual degradation of our biochemical machinery. Our biological clocks show that time exists, but it’s a more tangible kind of time and differs from the one defined by theoretical physics and the geometry of space.

The theory that space and time are linked differs from biological time, and that paradox provides possible clues about the universe and the role life plays. If time itself is a null value instead of a man-made benchmark like the light-year, then the universe’s only true measurement of time may be biological clocks. And since those biological clocks were built with the heavy elements produced by stars……