← Back to list

Why I Don’t Sell Options on Leveraged ETFs (And You Shouldn’t Either)

TQQQ and SQQQ premiums look tempting. But there’s a reason they’re so high — and it’s not a good one.

Peter Pru Prusinowski · 2025-12-06 13:43 · 25 claps · 4.6 min read
#tqqq #sqqq #leveraged-etfs #tqqq-options #sqqq-options
Open on Medium ↗
Wiki topics: RAG · RAG & Retrieval

Why I Don’t Sell Options on Leveraged ETFs (And You Shouldn’t Either)

TQQQ and SQQQ premiums look tempting. But there’s a reason they’re so high — and it’s not a good one.

If you’ve been exploring options trading, you’ve probably noticed something interesting about leveraged ETFs like TQQQ and SQQQ.

The premiums are huge.

A cash-secured put on TQQQ that collects $300 in premium looks way more attractive than the same trade on QQQ that only collects $100.

Same strategy. Triple the premium.

So why not just trade the leveraged version?

Because those high premiums come with high risk. And not the kind of risk you can manage.

Let me explain why I avoid selling options on leveraged ETFs — and why you might want to as well.

What Are Leveraged ETFs?

First, a quick primer.

TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) is a 3x leveraged ETF that attempts to deliver three times the daily return of the Nasdaq-100 index.

SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) is the inverse — it attempts to deliver three times the inverse daily return of the Nasdaq-100.

In theory:

  • If QQQ goes up 1% in a day, TQQQ should go up ~3%
  • If QQQ goes down 1% in a day, SQQQ should go up ~3%

Sounds simple, right?

Not quite.

The Problem: Volatility Decay

Leveraged ETFs are designed for short-term traders, not long-term holders.

Here’s why: They reset daily.

What does that mean?

TQQQ doesn’t track 3x the return of QQQ over a month or a year. It tracks 3x the daily return. Every single day, the leverage resets.

This creates something called volatility decay.

When markets go up and down (which they always do), leveraged ETFs lose value over time — even if the underlying index ends up flat.

Example: Volatility Decay in Action

Let’s say QQQ starts at $100.

Day 1: QQQ goes up 10% → ends at $110

  • TQQQ (3x leverage) goes up 30% → ends at $130

Day 2: QQQ goes down 9.09% → ends back at $100 (flat overall)

  • TQQQ goes down 27.27% → ends at $94.55

Result:

  • QQQ: Flat (started at $100, ended at $100)
  • TQQQ: Down 5.45% (started at $100, ended at $94.55)

This is volatility decay.

The more the market whipsaws, the more value TQQQ loses — even if the underlying index is flat or slightly up.

What This Means for Options Sellers

If you sell a cash-secured put on TQQQ, you’re agreeing to potentially buy shares at your strike price.

Here’s the problem:

If TQQQ drops below your strike and you get assigned, you’re now holding an asset that decays over time.

Unlike a stock like Apple or Microsoft — which you might be comfortable holding long-term if assigned — TQQQ is designed to be held for days, not months or years.

So what happens if you get assigned?

You’re stuck holding a decaying asset, and you have two bad options:

  1. Sell at a loss (cutting your position immediately)
  2. Hold and try to sell covered calls to recover (but the asset is losing value every day due to volatility decay)

Neither is ideal.

The 2022 Example

Let’s look at what happened during the 2022 bear market.

QQQ (the underlying index):

  • Dropped about 33% from peak to trough

TQQQ (the 3x leveraged version):

  • Dropped about 80% from peak to trough

Not 3x the loss. More than double 3x.

Why? Volatility decay.

The market didn’t just go straight down. It whipsawed. And every time it bounced and then dropped again, TQQQ lost more value.

If you sold a put on TQQQ in early 2022 and got assigned:

  • You would have been underwater for months
  • Your shares would have decayed significantly
  • Even if QQQ recovered, TQQQ would have lagged due to the daily reset mechanism

Why the Premiums Are So High

You might be thinking: “Okay, but the premiums are huge. Doesn’t that compensate for the risk?”

Not really.

Premiums on leveraged ETFs are high because implied volatility is high. And implied volatility is high because the risk is high.

The market is pricing in the decay risk.

You’re not getting “free money” by selling options on TQQQ. You’re getting compensated for taking on extreme risk.

And in options trading, high premium usually means high risk.

What I Do Instead

Instead of selling options on TQQQ or SQQQ, I sell options on the underlying: QQQ.

Why?

No volatility decay. QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 directly. No daily reset. No leverage.

Easier to hold if assigned. If I get assigned on QQQ, I’m holding a diversified basket of 100 of the best tech companies. I’m fine holding that long-term.

Lower risk, still good premium. Yes, the premium is smaller. But the risk is way lower. And I can still generate consistent income.

Example:

  • TQQQ at $50 → Sell $48 put, collect $300 premium
  • QQQ at $500 → Sell $490 put, collect $150 premium

The TQQQ premium looks better. But if TQQQ drops to $40 (not uncommon in a volatile market), you’re underwater and holding a decaying asset.

If QQQ drops to $480, you’re holding a quality ETF that will likely recover over time. And you can sell covered calls to manage your way out.

The lower premium on QQQ is worth it for the lower risk.

When Leveraged ETFs Might Make Sense

I’m not saying leveraged ETFs are “bad” or should never be traded.

They can make sense for:

  • Day traders or swing traders who hold for hours or days
  • Traders who want short-term directional exposure
  • Hedging strategies (used by professionals)

But for selling cash-secured puts or running the Wheel Strategy?

Not a good fit.

The Wheel Strategy works best on quality stocks or ETFs you’d be comfortable holding long-term if assigned. Leveraged ETFs don’t fit that criteria.

The Bottom Line

When I see a TQQQ or SQQQ option chain with huge premiums, I understand the temptation.

But I also understand what those premiums are pricing in:

  • Extreme volatility
  • Daily leverage resets
  • Volatility decay
  • Massive drawdown risk

I’d rather collect smaller premiums on QQQ and sleep well at night.

If you’re selling options to generate consistent income — not to gamble on short-term moves — stick with non-leveraged assets.

Sell puts on stocks or ETFs you’d actually want to own. Use RSI and technical analysis to time your entries. Close at 50% profit and redeploy.

That’s the strategy. Boring. Systematic. Effective.

Leveraged ETFs might look tempting. But the risk isn’t worth the reward.

Final Thoughts

This is educational content only. I’m not telling you what to do with your money. I’m sharing my personal approach and why I avoid selling options on leveraged ETFs.

Options trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Leveraged ETFs carry additional risks including volatility decay and magnified losses. Always do your own research and consult with a licensed financial professional before making investment decisions.

If you want to learn my full strategy for selling options on quality stocks and ETFs — including how I use RSI, Bollinger Bands, and the 50% Rule — I teach it all in my free Ark Options Workshop.

**Click To Attend The Workshop**

Peter Pru aka Peter Prusinowski


메타데이터
post_id
d931ff2e0049
slug
why-i-dont-sell-options-on-leveraged-etfs-and-you-shouldn-t-either-d931ff2e0049
url
https://medium.com/@peter_pru_prusinowski/why-i-dont-sell-options-on-leveraged-etfs-and-you-shouldn-t-either-d931ff2e0049
canonical_url
https://medium.com/@peter_pru_prusinowski/why-i-dont-sell-options-on-leveraged-etfs-and-you-shouldn-t-either-d931ff2e0049
author_url
https://medium.com/@peter_pru_prusinowski
status
ok
fetched_at
2026-06-25 12:15:08