THE UNSTRUCK SOUND (ANAHATA NADA) AND QUANTUM VACUUM

Courtesy: iStock

For over a decade, I have compared ancient Indian texts with current scientific research — a comparison that would have been far more difficult in the 1990s. The past twenty-five years of progress in relativity, quantum field theory, and cosmology have, in my view, brought these two domains closer than ever before. What once seemed an unbridgeable distance now appears more like a difference in method and language than a difference in subject matter.

The challenge is interpretive. We tend to assume that if science or mathematics is being expressed, it must look the way it does today: in formal notation, Latin-derived technical vocabulary, and peer-reviewed prose. Ancient texts worked differently. The same insight could be conveyed in poetic language, a compressed aphorism, the structure of a chant, or a philosophical argument that moves by analogy rather than by equation. This does not make it less precise. Sanskrit, in particular, possesses extraordinary technical capacity. The precision is there; it simply does not wear the clothes we are accustomed to.

This essay is one attempt at such a comparison — specifically, a comparison between what modern science tells us about the silence beyond our solar system and what the Vedic texts say about the levels of sound that lie beyond ordinary hearing. At the center of that Vedic account stands OM — not as a religious incantation but as a precise cosmological claim about the nature of vibration itself. Understanding what the texts actually mean by it changes how one reads both the ancient material and the physics. This essay tries to hold both together.

I. The solar system hums

The solar system is not quiet. Charged particles stream outward from the Sun in a continuous solar wind. Planets sit within magnetospheres that compress, pulse, and interact. At the heliopause — the boundary where the solar wind meets the interstellar medium — a standing disturbance forms. NASA’s plasma wave instruments, carried aboard Voyager and other probes, have translated these electromagnetic oscillations into audible frequencies. The recordings are unmistakable: hisses, whistles, rhythmic pulses. They are not metaphors. They are real oscillations in a real medium, sonified.

This is the immediate neighborhood. The question is what lies beyond it.

II. Beyond the heliopause

When Voyager 1 crossed the heliopause in 2012 and entered interstellar space, its plasma wave instrument did not go silent. It detected density oscillations in the interstellar plasma at around 3 kHz — a faint hum in the medium between stars. The interstellar medium is extraordinarily thin, roughly one atom per cubic centimeter, but it is not empty. Waves propagate in it. The instrument gave us a small window into what lies just beyond our solar neighborhood.

Deeper out, the picture changes. The cosmic microwave background — the CMB — is not sound in the conventional sense, but it carries acoustic information. In the first 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the universe was a hot, dense plasma. Sound waves moved through it. When the plasma cooled enough for hydrogen to form, those waves froze in place. The pattern of temperature fluctuations we detect across the sky today is the imprint of those primordial acoustic oscillations. Cosmologists call them the CMB acoustic peaks. They are the oldest sound record we have — the universe’s initial conditions written in vibration.

In 2023, the NANOGrav collaboration announced the detection of a gravitational wave background. Using an array of millisecond pulsars as a cosmic detector, they found a low-frequency hum pervading the universe. Its source appears to be the accumulated signal from millions of supermassive black hole binary systems, all slowly spiraling inward and radiating gravitational waves. This is not sound in any medium. It is spacetime itself oscillating. The universe hums at a level below anything electromagnetic, at the level of geometry.

Beneath all of this sits the quantum vacuum. Even in the complete absence of particles, quantum field theory requires that fields cannot be entirely still. The ground state of the electromagnetic field carries a zero-point energy. Particles constantly appear and vanish. This is the baseline hum of reality — not caused by any prior vibration, simply the minimum energy state of existence. What is physically distinctive about these fluctuations is that they are not triggered by anything. No prior event sets them off. No collision initiates them. They are, in the strictest sense, “Anahata or unstruck”. That word will matter later.

III. What the ancient texts said about the cosmos

Before turning to the Vedic parallels, we must first ask: how did the authors of these texts arrive at their descriptions of sound, vibration, and cosmic structure without radio telescopes, plasma wave instruments, or gravitational wave detectors? The descriptions are not vague. They are not merely poetic. They propose a specific account of how reality is organized, where it came from, and what underlies it.

The Nasadiya Sukta, the hymn of creation in the tenth mandala of the Rigveda (10.129), is one of the most remarkable cosmological texts in any language. It opens by saying that in the beginning, neither was being nor non-being, neither air nor sky, neither death nor immortality. There was darkness wrapped in darkness. Then it introduces a stirring — a first impulse it calls tapas, usually translated as heat or concentrated energy. From that came desire, which the hymn calls the first seed of mind. The sequence moves from undifferentiated darkness to a primal energetic impulse to something which resembles intention, and from there toward the differentiated world. The hymn then makes an extraordinary move: it says that even the gods do not know the origin, because they came after. The one who truly knows — if anyone does — is described as watching from the highest heaven. The text closes with a question, not an answer. That gesture of epistemic honesty is itself significant. This is not mythology in the sense of confident narrative. It is careful cosmological reasoning pushed to its limits.

The Taittiriya Upanishad (2.1) gives a more structured account. From Brahman, the ground of existence, arose space — Akasha. From space came air. From air came fire. From fire, water. From water came earth. From earth came plants, from plants food, and from food the embodied being. The cascade is not random. It moves from the subtle to the gross, from the less structured to the more structured. What matters here is that the first product of Brahman is Akasha — space. And in the Indian philosophical tradition, Akasha is the element specifically associated with sound. It is the medium of sound, the emptiness through which vibration travels. Creation, in this account, begins by producing the medium of sound before anything else exists. The universe’s first act is to make room for vibration.

The Samkhya school, one of the oldest systematic philosophical traditions in India, developed this further through the concept of Tanmatra — subtle essences that precede the gross elements. The tanmatra of sound, shabda, precedes Akasha itself. Before space, there is the subtle principle of sound. The universe, in this framework, is not a material system that happens to produce vibrations. It is a vibrational system that produces what we call matter as a downstream consequence. The Shaiva tantric tradition, particularly as developed by Abhinavagupta in the Tantraloka, built on this through the concept of spanda — primordial vibration — which it identified as the self-expression of consciousness. The universe does not vibrate. The universe is vibration, the self-pulsation of awareness taking form.

These are not isolated poetic images. They represent a consistent and widely shared cosmological claim across very different schools: that the universe originates in something more subtle than matter, that vibration or sound is primary, and that what we experience as the physical world is a later and grosser manifestation of processes that begin at a level we cannot ordinarily perceive.

IV. How the seers arrived at this

The answer appears to be observation — but observation of a kind that is rarely taken seriously in discussions of the history of science. The Vedic seers, the Upanishadic teachers, and the philosopher-grammarians of the Sanskrit tradition were not working from mythology alone, nor from pure speculation. They were working from sustained, disciplined, methodical attention directed inward. The tools were not external instruments. They were the trained human nervous system, the disciplined mind, and the capacity for deep meditative absorption.

This is not a romantic claim. It is a description of what the texts themselves say about their own method. The Mundaka Upanishad distinguishes between lower knowledge (apara vidya) — the study of the Vedas, grammar, ritual, astronomy, and the sciences — and higher knowledge (para vidya), which it describes as that by which the imperishable is known directly (Mundaka Upanishad 1.1.4–5). The text is explicit that these are two different epistemic modes, not two levels of the same mode. Lower knowledge uses external instruments and inference. Higher knowledge uses a trained interiority.

What the seers claimed to access through this method was not a random mystical experience but a structured, verifiable (within its own framework) account of the levels of reality from gross to subtle to transcendent. The descriptions are consistent across texts, across centuries, and across teachers who disagreed sharply on metaphysics but agreed on the architecture. That consistency is itself evidence of a reliable method. The mechanism that produced the consistency was the guru-shishya tradition — the transmission of knowledge from teacher to student over generations. This is often described in spiritual terms, and it is that. But it is also something else: a system for calibrating the instrument. A physicist cannot simply pick up a particle accelerator and begin producing results. The instrument requires years of training to use correctly, and the results of an untrained operator are discarded. The Vedic tradition made the same demand. The practitioner’s mind had to be brought to a specific condition — through diet, discipline, ethical conduct, and the progressive practice of dhyana — before the observations it produced were considered reliable. The guru’s role was partly to verify that the instrument was properly calibrated and to confirm or correct students' observations. This is not identical to peer review in the modern sense. But it is structurally similar: a process by which individual results are checked against an established framework and the standards of those who have successfully used the same instrument before.

The physicist David Bohm wrote toward the end of his life about what he called the implicate order — a level of reality in which everything is enfolded into everything else, from which the explicate, observable world unfolds. He arrived at this through quantum mechanics. He noted, without claiming equivalence, that the descriptions from certain meditative traditions bore a structural resemblance to what he was trying to say in the language of physics. He was careful about the comparison. But he did not dismiss it.

V. The four levels of speech

The most precise Vedic framework for understanding sound across these layers comes from the doctrine of the four levels of Vac, or speech. The Rigveda states it directly: catvari vak parimita padani — speech has four measured quarters (Rigveda 1.164.45). The Kashmir Shaiva philosopher Abhinavagupta and the grammarian-philosopher Bhartrhari elaborated what this means in their respective traditions, and while they differed in their metaphysics, their structural accounts were similar.

The four levels are Vaikhari, Madhyama, Pasyanti, and Para.

Vaikhari is sound as we ordinarily hear it — articulated, audible, transmitted through air. It is what the solar system produces in abundance: plasma oscillations, magnetospheric pulses, bow shocks. These are all Vaikhari in the extended sense — vibrations in a physical medium, detectable by external instruments.

Madhyama is the intermediate level — sound as it exists in the cognitive process before articulation. It is sound present but not yet fully manifest. This corresponds roughly to the interstellar plasma hum detected by Voyager 1: real oscillations in a real medium, but in a medium so thin and so far from ordinary experience that they barely register as physical reality from our vantage point.

Pasyanti, which means the seeing one, is sound at the level where it is still undivided — where meaning and vibration are not yet separated. This is the level Bhartrhari called Sphota, the unit of speech in which sound and meaning are one thing, not two things associated by convention (Vakyapadiya 1.44). The CMB acoustic peaks occupy a structurally similar position. They are vibration-frozen at the moment of recombination, carrying the initial conditions of the entire observable universe. The information encoded in them is not separable from the vibration that carries it. The universe’s structure and its acoustic record are the same thing.

Para is transcendent sound — before any vibration in a medium, self-arising, not caused by any prior event. The texts describe it as identical with Brahman, the ground of existence. The quantum vacuum’s zero-point energy occupies a structurally analogous position: the ground state of all fields, present even in the complete absence of particles, from which all observable reality emerges. It is not caused by anything prior. It is simply the minimum energy of existence.

OM is the Vedic name for this entire progression taken together. It is not one level among the four but the syllable that encodes the structure of all four. The Mandukya Upanishad opens by saying that OM is all of this — sarvam hy etad brahma — everything is Brahman, and this self is Brahman (Mandukya Upanishad 1–2). The three phonemes A, U, and M are not arbitrary. A arises from the open throat, the most primary vocal gesture, and corresponds to the waking state and gross matter. U forms as the mouth begins to close, corresponding to the subtle. M closes the lips entirely, corresponding to the causal. And the silence after M — the fourth — is not absence. It is the ground from which the sound arose and into which it returns. Bhartrhari understood OM as the primordial Sphota, the original word-meaning unit from which all speech differentiates (Vakyapadiya 1.5). Every word in every language is, at its root, a modification of this one primordial vibration.

The tantric and yogic traditions add one further concept here: anahata nada, the unstruck sound. In ordinary acoustics, sound is produced by percussion — two things meeting, a string vibrating against air, a membrane struck by a hammer. Anahata means without striking. It is the vibration that is not caused by any prior collision. The Nada Upanishad and the broader tradition of nada yoga treat this as the deepest audible level of reality, accessible to the practitioner in deep meditation as a continuous inner resonance with no external source. This is not poetry. It is a precise description of a category: vibration that is self-arising, uncaused. The quantum vacuum’s zero-point fluctuations are, in physical terms, exactly that — oscillations in the ground state of the field that are not triggered by any prior perturbation. They are, in the most literal physical sense, unstruck.

VI. The Mandukya and the silence

The Mandukya Upanishad, one of the shortest and most concentrated of the Upanishads, is organized around OM. Its twelve verses map the three phonemes A, U, and M onto the three states of consciousness — waking, dreaming, and deep sleep — and then introduce a fourth element: the silence after the M, which it calls Turiya, the fourth. Turiya is not a fourth state alongside the other three. It is the witness that underlies all three, always present, never itself an object of experience. The silence at the end of OM is not the absence of sound. It is the condition that makes sound possible — the ground into which the vibration dissolves and from which it re-emerges. This is a precise claim about the structure of reality, not a meditative mood. The text is saying that what we call silence is the most fundamental level of existence, the one from which all manifest vibration proceeds.

Gaudapada’s Karika on the Mandukya, the earliest systematic Advaita Vedanta text, develops this into a full philosophical account. Reality, Gaudapada argues, does not change at the fundamental level. What we take to be successive states — waking, dreaming, deep sleep — are like appearances within the one unchanging awareness. The word he uses is ajati, non-origination. Nothing truly originates. Everything is an appearance within what always already is.

Modern cosmology has arrived, by a completely different route, at a version of the same puzzle. The visible universe — everything that generates signals we can detect — accounts for roughly five percent of the universe’s total energy content. The remaining ninety-five percent is dark matter and dark energy. These do not interact electromagnetically. They do not hum in any sense we can directly detect. They are causally dominant — the structure of the visible universe is shaped entirely by their presence — but they produce no acoustic or electromagnetic signal. They are, in the most literal physical sense, the silence underlying the manifest universe.

This is not an equivalence. The Turiya of Vedanta is awareness itself; dark energy is a physical quantity whose nature remains unknown. But the functional parallel is worth pressing. In cosmology, the visible universe — galaxies, stars, planets, everything we can detect — does not determine its own structure. The distribution of dark matter dictates where galaxies form. The value of dark energy determines the rate at which the universe expands and the ultimate fate of all visible structure. The invisible does not merely coexist with the visible. It governs it. The Mandukya makes the same claim about Turiya: the three manifest states of waking, dreaming, and deep sleep do not generate themselves. They arise within and are sustained by the witnessing awareness that is itself never an object. Remove Turiya, and the three states have no ground. Remove dark matter and dark energy, and the visible universe has no structure. In both cases, what cannot be directly observed is what makes the observable possible.

VII. Bhartrhari and the information problem

The Sphota doctrine connects directly to the cosmological framework already described. If OM is the primordial Sphota — the original undivided word-meaning unit — then Bhartrhari’s central claim is that the universe’s vibrational structure and its informational content are not two things. The most philosophically precise parallel between Vedic thought and contemporary physics lies exactly here.

The central claim of the Vakyapadiya is that at the deepest level, sound and meaning are not two things. They are one thing — the Sphota — which appears divided only at the gross level of articulated speech. A word is not a sequence of phonemes that happens to be associated with a meaning. At its root, the word-meaning unit is indivisible (Vakyapadiya 1.44–46).

The Samkhya tradition had already laid the groundwork for this claim at the cosmological level. Recall that in the Samkhya framework, the shabda tanmatra — the subtle principle of sound — precedes Akasha, the element of space. This is not a small point. It means that in the Samkhya account of creation, the informational content of reality, its vibrational essence, comes before the medium through which vibration travels. Matter does not produce information as a byproduct. Information, in the form of the subtle tanmatra, produces matter as its gross expression. The universe is not a collection of things that happen to carry information. It is a structure of information that has condensed into things.

Contemporary physics has been circling a structurally similar idea through the holographic principle and quantum information theory. The holographic principle, developed from work by Jacob Bekenstein and Stephen Hawking on black hole thermodynamics and extended by Juan Maldacena’s AdS/CFT correspondence, holds that the information content of any volume of space is encoded on its boundary surface. At the deepest level, the universe may be a quantum information structure in which the physical laws governing it are not imposed on top of the information but are the same thing as the information. The physicist John Wheeler called this it from bit: physical reality arises from information, not the other way around. This is not a fringe view. It is an active research program in theoretical physics, and its central claim — that information is before matter — is structurally identical to what Samkhya and Bhartrhari were saying by a completely different route.

Bhartrhari was not doing physics. But he had identified the same structural problem fifteen centuries earlier: at some level, the medium and the message are the same thing. The vibration carries the meaning because at that level, vibration is meaning.

VIII. The method and what it implies

What is most striking about the Vedic descriptions is not that they anticipated specific findings of modern physics. On individual points, one can always find parallels and counter-parallels, and it would be dishonest to claim systematic equivalence. What is striking is the architecture of the account: the layered model moving from gross to subtle to transcendent; the insistence on a substrate that underlies all observable phenomena yet is not observable by external means; the recognition that information and vibration are not separable at the root level. These structural features appear in both Vedic texts and contemporary physics, arrived at through entirely different methods.

The Vedic method was interior. The seers of the Upanishads worked with the trained human instrument — the mind brought to unusual stillness and acuity through years of practice, the nervous system refined by discipline, diet, and attention, the faculty of discrimination (viveka) developed to distinguish the movements of awareness from the objects appearing within it. The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali describe this method in systematic detail: the progressive stilling of mental movements (citta vrtti nirodha) until what remains is the witness alone (Yoga Sutras 1.2–3). The Mandukya describes what that witness then discovers.

This is not mysticism in the pejorative sense. It is a research program with a specific instrument — trained human awareness — and a specific domain: the structure of experience and what underlies it. The results were recorded, debated, tested through the tradition of guru-shishya transmission, and revised where necessary. The philosophical schools of India argued fiercely with each other precisely because they were all engaged in the same empirical project, using the same instrument, and getting results that needed to be reconciled.

What modern science adds is the external dimension: instruments that detect what the unaided nervous system cannot; mathematics that describes quantitative relationships meditation cannot access; and a method of replication that does not depend on the practitioner reaching a particular state of development. These are genuine additions. They are not replacements for what the seers were doing. They are measurements of a different surface of the same reality.

The solar system hums because it is full of excited matter in a medium. Beyond it, the cosmos hums at progressively deeper levels: interstellar plasma, the frozen acoustic record of the Big Bang, the gravitational oscillation of spacetime itself, and finally the zero-point energy of the quantum vacuum — vibration without a cause, oscillation in the ground state of existence. The ancient seers, working from the inside, described the same progression in reverse — from the gross and audible outward to the subtle, and from the subtle to Para, the transcendent ground of all vibration. They called that ground OM. And for the uncaused vibration at its base — the vibration that requires no percussion, no collision, no prior event — they had a specific term: anahata nada, the unstruck sound. Not as poetry. As the most precise description available to them of what physics is now, by a different route, is beginning to confirm.

References

Abhinavagupta. Tantraloka. Translated by Mark Dyczkowski. Dilip Kumar Publishers, 1987.

Bhartrhari. Vakyapadiya. Translated by K. A. Subramania Iyer. Deccan College, 1965.

Bohm, David. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge, 1980.

Gaudapada. Mandukya Karika. Translated by Swami Nikhilananda. Ramakrishna Mission, 1955.

Gurnett, D. A., et al. “In Situ Observations of Interstellar Plasma with Voyager 1.” Science, vol. 341, no. 6153, 2013.

Maldacena, Juan. “The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 38, 1999.

Mandukya Upanishad. In The Principal Upanishads. Translated by S. Radhakrishnan. George Allen and Unwin, 1953.

Mundaka Upanishad. In The Principal Upanishads. Translated by S. Radhakrishnan. George Allen and Unwin, 1953.

Nada Upanishad. In Thirty Minor Upanishads. Translated by K. Narayanasvami Aiyar. Theosophical Publishing House, 1914.

NANOGrav Collaboration. “The NANOGrav 15-Year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background.” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 951, no. 1, 2023.

Patanjali. Yoga Sutras. Translated by Georg Feuerstein. Inner Traditions, 1990.

Penzias, A. A., and Wilson, R. W. “A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s.” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 142, 1965.

Rigveda 1.164.45. In The Hymns of the Rigveda. Translated by Ralph T. H. Griffith. Kotagiri, 1896.

Silk, Joseph. The Big Bang. W. H. Freeman, 2000.

Wheeler, John Archibald. “Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links.” In Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Santa Fe Institute, 1990.