Joan of Arc: What History Chose to Forget

She saved a crown, was abandoned by a king, and turned into a legend.

She was nineteen years old when they burned her. She had been dead for twenty-five years when the verdict against her was overturned. And nearly five centuries passed before the Church proclaimed her a saint. Joan of Arc is perhaps the most mythologised figure in French history — which is precisely why so much of what truly happened to her has been obscured.

Joan of Arc: What History Chose to Forget — merutta.com

She was nineteen years old when they burned her. Charles VII, the king whose coronation she had helped secure at Reims, made no known attempt to save her. Twenty-five years later, when she could no longer trouble the living politics of France, her conviction was overturned. History has given Joan of Arc a halo. What it has been slower to acknowledge is the cold calculation that surrounded her life, her death, and her rehabilitation — and what that calculation reveals about power, faith, and the uses of legend.

The Girl Who Was Not Supposed to Matter

In January 1412, in the village of Domrémy on the frontier of the Duchy of Bar, a child was born to Jacques d’Arc and Isabelle Romée. The family were not serfs. They held land, paid taxes, and occupied a modest but reasonably secure place in rural society. Her father served as a local official with minor administrative duties, including the collection of dues for the lord. Joan, as she would later be known, was the fourth of five children. She could neither read nor write. By the standards of her world, she was not expected to matter.

What she did possess, from an early age, was an inner life of unusual intensity. At around thirteen, she later said, she began to hear voices — those of Saint Catherine of Alexandria, Saint Margaret of Antioch, and the Archangel Michael. To a modern reader, such claims may invite scepticism. To fifteenth-century France, they belonged to a language the age already understood.

France in the 1420s was not a nation in any modern sense. It was a fractured and exhausted kingdom. Under the Treaty of Troyes of 1420, the English Crown had been recognised as regent of France, and Henry VI of England was acknowledged as heir to the French throne. The Dauphin Charles, later Charles VII, had been disinherited and driven from Paris. He kept court at Chinon, a diminished figure whose legitimacy was contested even among those who supported him.

It was into this political, military, and dynastic crisis that a teenage girl from an obscure village arrived in 1429 with a claim that should have been impossible to ignore and impossible to believe.

The Examination at Chinon — and What It Revealed

Joan’s arrival at the court of Charles at Chinon in March 1429 is well documented, though often romanticised. Popular retellings describe the Dauphin concealing himself among his courtiers in order to test her, only for Joan to identify him at once. Whether embellished or not, the anecdote obscures a more important reality: the court had already begun to take her seriously before any theatrical encounter took place.

Messengers had been sent to inquire into her background. She was examined by clerics and theologians associated with the royal cause at Poitiers before being permitted to accompany military operations. Their judgement, so far as it can be reconstructed, was cautious rather than ecstatic. They found no evident sign of heresy and advised that she might be tested in action at Orléans.

This was not a declaration of divine certainty. It was a decision made by a desperate court that had exhausted conventional remedies and recognised the possible value of conviction, symbolism, and hope.

What Charles required was not merely a commander, but a story capable of restoring belief. Joan, with her absolute confidence, her refusal to be dismissed, and her extraordinary ability to inspire men long accustomed to defeat, provided one.

Orléans: The Reality Behind the Legend

On 29 April 1429, Joan entered Orléans, which had been under English siege since the previous autumn. The city had not yet fallen, but the position was grave. Supply routes were strained, morale was fragile, and English fortifications pressed hard around its approaches. Within days, the siege was broken.

The precise extent of Joan’s tactical influence remains debated. She carried a banner rather than serving as a conventional combatant, and the experienced captains around her — among them Jean de Dunois and La Hire — were soldiers of proven ability. Yet her presence mattered. Wounded by an arrow on 7 May, she returned to the field the same day. To French forces she appeared a sign of divine favour; to the English, a deeply unsettling adversary.

After Orléans, momentum shifted rapidly. On 17 July 1429, Charles VII was crowned at Reims Cathedral, the traditional site of French coronation and long beyond his reach. Joan stood beside him, carrying her banner. She was seventeen years old.

The Capture — and the Court That Condemned Her

On 23 May 1430, Joan was captured by Burgundian forces near Compiègne. The Burgundians, allied with the English against Charles, later transferred her to English control in exchange for a substantial sum. Such arrangements were not unusual in the practice of late medieval warfare.

What followed has, by contrast, drawn sustained criticism from historians and legal scholars alike. The trial held at Rouen between January and May 1431 was shaped by political interests from the outset. Its presiding judge, Pierre Cauchon, Bishop of Beauvais, was closely aligned with the English cause and had personal as well as political reasons to seek Joan’s discrediting. The tribunal itself was dominated by clergy sympathetic to England.

Joan faced charges of heresy, sorcery, and, most revealingly, the wearing of male dress. The question of clothing occupied a strikingly prominent place in the proceedings. Under medieval canon law, cross-dressing could be treated as a grave violation of divinely ordered hierarchy. Joan maintained that her clothing was practical, necessary, and protective in military and custodial settings. It became one of the central instruments used against her.

On 24 May 1431, she signed an abjuration she may not have fully understood. The text was complex, and the circumstances of its presentation remain contested. When she later resumed male dress — whether by choice, necessity, or because her female garments had been removed — she was declared a relapsed heretic.

On 30 May 1431, in the marketplace at Rouen, Joan of Arc was burned at the stake. She asked that a crucifix be held before her as the fire was lit. She was nineteen years old.

In 1429, France saw deliverance ride through its gates….

Read more on the website: merutta.com