Too Lazy

I’m Agnostic Because I’m Too Lazy to Panic

Notes on thirst, self-justifying delusions, and the ancient art of pretending your preferences are destiny

We All Thirst

I want to talk some more about nihilism, but first, let me ruin your day with a small experiment.

Watch yourself reach for a glass of water. Go on. Notice why you did it. You’ll say “I was thirsty.” Cute. Now ask why you were thirsty.

Congratulations, you’ve just stumbled into biology, which will cheerfully explain that your body is a leaking bag of chemicals that occasionally demands topping up, a design feature inherited from ancestors who were mostly just trying not to die before they could reproduce.

So the profound truth behind your sip of water is: some horny, dehydrated ape millions of years ago passed on a survival glitch, and now you, a grown adult with opinions about wine and interior design, are its obedient little puppet. That’s it. That’s the whole show. You didn’t choose to be thirsty any more than a toaster chooses to pop.

Keep pulling that thread, and everything you do unravels the same way. Why do you go to work? To make money. Why do you want money? To survive, and maybe impress people. Why do you want to impress people? Because status once meant better odds of mating and not getting eaten.

Congratulations again; your entire personality is based on a coping mechanism for a threat that hasn’t existed in ten thousand years, and hormones that keep you horny 24/7.

This is nihilism in its simplest form: the suspicion that there is no purpose underneath any of it, just a long chain of “why” questions that eventually bottoms out in “because evolution needed you to shut up and survive.”

There’s no God-given reason, no cosmic memo explaining the assignment. You’re just meat, running a program.

Now, here’s where people get it wrong, and where I get delighted. Everyone assumes nihilists are the ones lying in bed all day, staring at the ceiling, too enlightened or depressed to get up and shower.

Sure, some are; turns out there’s a nice correlation between “life is meaningless” and “I can’t get out of bed,” which is either very sad or very funny depending on how much you like watching people fail to cope.

But nihilism was never a ban on wanting things. It’s not that the nihilist has no desires. It’s that the nihilist knows the desires are decoration, not destiny. You’re still thirsty. You still drink the water, go to work, make money, and try to mate.

You also know, somewhere in the back of your skull, that the whole performance is meaningless theater put on by your glands. That’s the joke, and you’re both the audience and the punchline.

Most people never get this far, because most people have built themselves a tidy little machine that stops the questioning early.

Ask them why they get up, and they’ll say “for my kids.” Ask why the kids matter, and they’ll look at you like you just insulted their mother, because to them, that’s where the questioning is supposed to stop.

That’s their self-justifying principle, the spot where “why” becomes rude. For the religious, it’s God; everything traces back to some glorious cosmic HR department.

For everyone else, it’s usually something warm and sentimental: family, love, a hobby they’ve dressed up as a calling. It feels bulletproof from the inside.

From the outside, it’s just a preference to wear a very convincing costume. You don’t love your kids because it’s objectively correct to love them; plenty of people without kids sleep fine.

You love them because you happen to, the same way you happen to prefer chocolate to boiled cabbage.

Nobody’s about to admit their entire reason for existing is basically a flavor preference, so they call it meaning instead. Fair enough. I’d rather call my leash a relationship too.

If you want a real masterclass in this, skip the modern philosophers and go read throughout the book of Ecclesiastes. Some Bronze Age king with every luxury imaginable — wine, women, palaces, the works — sat down and wrote, essentially, “I had everything, and it was all wind. All of it. Pointless.”

Thousands of years before anyone coined the word nihilism, some guy with more gold than sense already worked out that meaning is a mirage, and he wrote it down in what is technically supposed to be a holy book.

Then, at the very end, some helpful editor bolts on a moral: “fear God and keep his commandments.” No explanation of how that fixes anything. It’s the philosophical equivalent of a horror movie tacking on a smiley ending because test audiences complained.

The diagnosis is brutal and correct. The cure is a shrug dressed as a sermon. That’s basically the entire genre of nihilistic literature in one book: brilliant, devastating honesty about the void, followed by an unconvincing little bandage at the end because nobody can bear to leave it open.

Camus at least had the decency to be blunt about it, opening an entire book by saying the only real philosophical question is whether to have coffee or kill yourself.

His answer, famously, was to imagine Sisyphus happy, forever pushing his rock up a hill for absolutely no reason, and just… deciding to enjoy it anyway.

Personally, I find “imagine the eternally tortured man is fine, actually” a slightly desperate move, but I respect the commitment to the bit.

Here’s my favorite way to feel the whole absurdity of it: imagine explaining this to an alien.

“I go to work because I need money.” “Sure, makes sense.” “I need money because otherwise I’ll suffer.” “Also makes sense.” “But I wish there was a reason for all of it.”

The alien just stares at you because there is one; you gave it twice, and you rejected both perfectly good answers because you wanted something bigger and shinier called “purpose,” which doesn’t exist and never will, and which no logically consistent being would ever bother wanting.

Explaining modus ponens to that alien would take five seconds. Explaining why you’re sad despite having food, shelter, and a functioning nervous system would take a lifetime, because it’s not actually a logic problem. It’s a mood wearing a philosophy costume.

Which brings me to my own, deeply unglamorous stance: agnosticism, not because it’s brave, but because it’s the only position lazy enough to leave me alone. I don’t know why anything exists.

Neither does anyone else, including the people who sound very confident on podcasts. I find that oddly soothing: the way not knowing whether it’ll rain on some hypothetical wedding day is soothing; you can’t properly panic about a disaster you’re not convinced is coming.

The confident nihilist is miserable because they’re sure the universe is empty. The confident believer is anxious because they’re sure there’s a cosmic performance review coming.

I’m just standing in the middle, shrugging, mildly amused by both crowds, waiting for either group to actually prove something instead of just feeling it very hard and calling the feeling evidence.

And honestly, that’s most of philosophy, isn’t it? Not people reasoning their way into new beliefs, but people finding fancier words for what their mood already decided.

You’re not depressed because you read Nietzsche. You read Nietzsche because you were already depressed and needed a citation.

So maybe the real lesson isn’t that life is meaningless. Maybe it’s just that we’re a species of thirsty apes, desperately annotating our own plumbing, and calling the footnotes “the meaning of life.” Go ahead, drink your water. Nobody’s grading this.

Copyright © 2026 MOXY. All rights reserved.

New Literary Society