← Back to list

Assets Have Forgotten Their Purpose

The world is obsessed with asset prices.  But price is the least important thing about an asset.

SK Gremont · 2026-03-10 14:14 · 0 claps · 1.7 min read
#futureofmoney #monetary-system #economic-philosophy #store-of-value #financial-infrastructure
Open on Medium ↗
Wiki topics: ECO · Economy · General PHI · Philosophy 💭 · Philosophy of Spirit

Assets Have Forgotten Their Purpose

The world is obsessed with asset prices. But price is the least important thing about an asset.

The real question is simple:

What is the asset for?

Every asset in history began with a purpose. Land produced food. Metals enabled tools and trade. Infrastructure moved goods and people. Financial instruments funded real economic activity.

Assets existed because they did something useful.

Yet over time many assets have drifted away from their purpose. Their justification has been reduced to a single phrase:

Store of value.

But value cannot exist without utility.

Some argue that store of value is the utility. In reality, it is often a belief — a narrative powerful enough to sustain demand even when the underlying usefulness becomes unclear.

Ironically, many who promote store-of-value narratives also argue that fiat money has no intrinsic value, claiming people are forced to use it.

This misunderstands the foundation of modern money.

Fiat’s value comes from its utility as a medium of exchange.

That role was not created overnight. It emerged through centuries of trade, institutions, legal systems, political struggle, and even war. Entire civilizations built the infrastructure required for money to function as the common language of exchange.

To dismiss fiat as “valueless” ignores one of humanity’s most significant economic achievements.

The real debate is not whether money has value.

The real debate is who controls the power embedded within it.

Modern monetary systems were designed primarily around states, institutions, and large corporations. Stability and coordination were prioritized, but so was control.

Over time, the system has revealed its tension:

Inclusiveness vs. control. Scalability vs. security.

Solving one often weakens the other.

The next step in monetary evolution may not be replacement, but parallel emergence.

A new kind of monetary infrastructure — transparent, verifiable, and globally inclusive — may develop alongside existing systems.

This could mark the beginning of a Third Money.

Not commodity money. Not state money.

But infrastructure money — systems that enable value exchange and record integrity at global scale.

If such a system proves honest and inclusive, it will not destroy the existing order.

It will force it to evolve.

And throughout history, civilizations do not advance through collapse alone.

They advance when better infrastructure quietly replaces the limits of the old.

Publication: The Third Money (Amazon Kindle)


메타데이터
post_id
f8367695f63d
slug
skgremont-f8367695f63d
url
https://medium.com/@bsvj/skgremont-f8367695f63d
canonical_url
https://medium.com/@bsvj/skgremont-f8367695f63d
author_url
https://medium.com/@bsvj
status
ok
fetched_at
2026-06-23 17:05:31