Where’s The Logic? Where’s The Math?

This is Mathematically Impossible

Elon Musk just became the world’s first trillionaire.

He’s now a trillion dollars ahead of the next richest person on Earth.

He could lose a trillion dollars and still be the richest man alive.

How it happened

SpaceX IPO’d at $135 a share. Roughly $1.75 trillion valuation.

It popped 20% on day one.

Then it kept going. Two days later it passed Amazon — $2.6 trillion. Three days in, it briefly neared $3 trillion and passed Microsoft.

Today SpaceX sits around fifth or sixth on the list of the world’s most valuable companies.

Elon Musk’s net worth hit $1.1 trillion on day one and kept climbing from there.

Why this valuation makes no sense — the vending machine test

Picture a vending machine that makes $400 a month.

What would you pay for it? The actual market answer today is roughly $4,000 — a reasonable multiple based on payback time and normal risk.

If someone offered you that same vending machine for $100 million, you’d immediately know something was wrong. No amount of optimism about future snack sales justifies that price.

But if Elon Musk personally pitches the same absurd valuation, people say yes.

The company that doesn’t belong

Take the list of the world’s most valuable companies. Now take the list of the world’s most profitable companies.

They’re almost identical. Every name overlaps except two — Tesla and SpaceX.

Every other company in the top tier — Apple, Microsoft, Saudi Aramco, Nvidia — makes enormous amounts of real profit right now. Their valuations blend real current earnings with reasonable hope for future growth.

SpaceX has skipped that step entirely. It’s valued on pure hope, with essentially nothing but Elon Musk himself as the collateral for that hope.

☞ On medium I tell you what happened, on patreon I tell you what’s next

📌 Join here → Patreon 📌

📖 Read Now — Stocks, Bitcoin or Gold? Which is Better Right Now?

The actual numbers

SpaceX at launch was valued higher than every major aerospace company combined — Boeing, Airbus, Raytheon, Lockheed, Honeywell. All of them together.

Within three days it became worth more than the entire global aerospace and defense sector combined.

The revenue comparison that actually fits SpaceX’s size is Carnival Cruise Lines. Carnival made $25 billion last year. SpaceX made $18.7 billion.

The difference — Carnival made a profit. SpaceX is valued like Amazon while generating revenue comparable to a cruise line.

The Morgan Stanley numbers problem

To justify a valuation this extreme you need a growth story.

Morgan Stanley — one of the banks that personally profited hundreds of millions from underwriting this IPO — put out growth projections aggressive enough to theoretically justify the $1.75 trillion starting valuation.

The stock is already trading well above that.

So Elon responded by predicting $1 trillion in revenue by 2030 — more than 50 times current revenue.

His fans treated this as evidence the banks were underselling him.

Nobody seemed to ask whether the man who owns 80% of the company might have a slight incentive to say that.

How the pop was engineered

SpaceX only floated about 4% of the total company on public markets. The other 96% is locked up — owned by Musk and insiders who can’t sell yet.

All the frenzied bidding happened on a tiny sliver of available shares. Massive demand chasing a deliberately small supply drives the price up on paper, even though most of the company hasn’t actually traded at that price.

Musk didn’t hire one investment bank to underwrite the IPO. He hired twenty. With a $500 million bonus pool if they successfully pumped and sold the stock.

Every major Wall Street firm had direct financial incentive to hype this IPO to retail investors.

Fidelity changed its normal $100,000 account minimum for IPO participation down to $2,000 — specifically for this listing. Retail buyers were also locked into holding for six months minimum, banned from flipping for quick profit.

Retail investors are structurally set up to be the ones holding the bag if this deflates.

The engineering behind the buying spree

Three days after going public, SpaceX bought Cursor for $60 billion — paid entirely in stock. The company’s valuation swings by $200 billion in a single day, so $60 billion in newly printed shares costs Musk essentially nothing real.

The $85 billion raised in the IPO itself went largely toward paying off debt from Musk’s previous financial messes — specifically Twitter and XAI, both loss-making businesses with heavy debt loads that got folded into SpaceX.

And immediately after paying off that debt, SpaceX turned around and issued another $20 billion in new debt.

What Warren Buffett says about this

Buffett has explained clearly why he avoids IPOs like this. The people selling you the stock control the timing. They decide when conditions are most favorable for them to cash out — not for you to buy in.

The twenty biggest banks on Wall Street and Elon Musk have collectively decided this is the optimal moment to sell shares to retail investors at the most extreme valuation multiple ever recorded for a company this size.

That’s not usually a coincidence that favors the buyer.

The endgame risk

Average IPOs see a 54% drawdown in their first year as lockup periods expire and insiders begin selling.

SpaceX’s lockup unlocks in stages over the next six months. As more shares become available, supply increases while retail enthusiasm typically fades.

The likely endgame — as the gap between SpaceX’s actual financial performance and its valuation becomes impossible to ignore, expect a Tesla-SpaceX merger. Combining the two overvalued entities to produce one more mega pump and obscure the underlying lack of real earnings a while longer.

The bigger picture

Elon Musk’s net worth now exceeds the combined wealth of entire nations — Finland, Qatar, and others in that tier.

In the 2024 election he personally donated $300 million to influence the outcome. At current wealth levels he could do that more than three thousand times over without meaningfully denting his fortune.

That is not simply “a rich person being rich.” It’s a concentration of financial and political power without historical precedent, operating largely outside rules that would sink anyone else attempting the same financial maneuvers.

The math doesn’t work. The story is doing all the lifting the numbers can’t.

I can only write limitedly on Medium

So I had to leave out the deeper parts, this was just the surface, the plot thickens ➻ HERE

❤️ If you like my articles, please consider supporting me with some donation here

→ My PayPal