IDEXX vs. Zoetis vs. Fujifilm vs. Seamaty
Veterinary biochemistry analyzers are essential tools for modern veterinary practices, enabling quick and accurate diagnosis through blood…
IDEXX vs. Zoetis vs. Fujifilm vs. Seamaty: Which Veterinary Biochemistry Analyzer is Right for Your Practice?

Comparing Veterinary Biochemistry Analyzers
Veterinary biochemistry analyzers are essential tools for modern veterinary practices, enabling quick and accurate diagnosis through blood, serum, and plasma testing. With various options on the market, choosing the right analyzer can be challenging.
In this post, we’ll compare four leading veterinary biochemistry analyzers: IDEXX Catalyst One, Fujifilm DRI-CHEM NX600, Zoetis Vetscan, and Seamaty 120VP, highlighting their features, strengths, and drawbacks to help you make an informed decision.
1. IDEXX Catalyst One
IDEXX Catalyst One is a well-known brand in the veterinary diagnostics field, offering a high level of accuracy and an extensive range of test parameters.
· Reagent Form: Single-user dry biochemical slides
· Sample Types: Whole blood, serum, plasma, urine
· Sample Volume: 700 µL for whole blood, 300 µL for serum/plasma
· Testing Time: 8 minutes (additional time needed for centrifugation)
· Volume: 12 kg
· Testing Items: 40 testing items, including biochemistry, electrolytes, and urine analysis, with 6 pre-installed combinations.
Pros:
A comprehensive array of parameters, including SDMA, pancreatic lipase, and thyroid tests.
Flexible reagent card combinations cater to various clinical needs.
Excellent connectivity options with mobile apps and vet practice software.
Cons:
High cost and slightly complex operation due to multiple steps.
No coagulation or CHE tests.
CHEM 17 lacks electrolytes.
2. Fujifilm DRI-CHEM NX600
Fujifilm’s DRI-CHEM NX600 is recognized for its customizable test profiles and automation, reducing manual handling.
· Reagent Form: Single-user dry biochemical slides
· Sample Types: Whole blood, serum, plasma
· Sample Volume: 10 µL per biochemical parameter, 50 µL for electrolytes
· Testing Time: 10 minutes (centrifugation required)
· Volume: 28 kg
· Testing Items: 29 biochemical items and 3 electrolytes, with 5 pre-installed combinations.
Pros:
Up to 20 parameters can be tested in a single run.
Low sample volume required per test.
Fully automated processes eliminate the need for manual pipetting.
Cons:
Large and bulky design.
Limited software connectivity and basic lab management software.
No coagulation, fructosamine, or some newer parameters found in competitors.
3. Zoetis Vetscan
Zoetis Vetscan is celebrated for its portability and ease of use, making it a popular choice for smaller clinics.
· Reagent Form: Single-user reagent disc
· Sample Types: Whole blood, serum, plasma
· Sample Volume: 100 µL
· Testing Time: 12 minutes
· Volume: 5.4 kg
Testing Items: 25 total items, focusing on biochemistry and electrolytes.
Pros:
Compact and easy to operate with minimal sample volume.
Reliable performance with consistent results and improved connectivity.
Supports whole blood testing directly, saving preparation time.
Cons:
Higher costs for consumables and limited reagent disc combinations.
Lacks several key parameters such as lactate, cortisol, and coagulation.
Product updates and iterations are relatively slow.
4. Seamaty 120VP
Seamaty 120VP is an emerging player, offering the broadest range of tests among its competitors at a highly competitive price.
· Reagent Form: Single-user reagent disc
· Sample Types: Whole blood, serum, plasma
· Sample Volume: 100 µL
· Testing Time: 12 minutes
· Volume: 4 kg
Testing Items: 47 testing items, including biochemistry, electrolytes, immunological items, and coagulation.
Pros:
Most comprehensive range of parameters, up to 24 in a single test.
Very low sample volume required, making it efficient for small samples.
Light, portable, and cost-effective, ideal for various clinical settings.
Cons:
Not as well-known or established as other brands, which may affect brand perception.

IDEXX vs. Zoetis vs. Fujifilm vs. Seamaty
Conclusion
Choosing the right veterinary biochemistry analyzer depends on your clinic’s specific needs, budget, and testing requirements. IDEXX Catalyst One stands out for its connectivity and comprehensive test offerings, but at a higher cost and complexity. Fujifilm DRI-CHEM NX600 provides customizable profiles with automated operation but is bulky and limited in some parameters. Zoetis Vetscan offers reliability and ease of use in a compact form but lacks certain advanced tests and has higher consumable costs. Seamaty 120VP offers the best range of tests and cost-effectiveness, making it an excellent choice for clinics seeking versatility without breaking the bank.
Ultimately, each analyzer has its strengths and trade-offs, and your decision should align with the unique demands of your veterinary practice.
메타데이터
- post_id
- d7453dd411f6
- slug
- idexx-vs-zoetis-vs-fujifilm-vs-seamaty-d7453dd411f6
- url
- https://medium.com/@sundulenkovmiha/idexx-vs-zoetis-vs-fujifilm-vs-seamaty-d7453dd411f6
- canonical_url
- https://medium.com/@sundulenkovmiha/idexx-vs-zoetis-vs-fujifilm-vs-seamaty-d7453dd411f6
- author_url
- https://medium.com/@sundulenkovmiha
- status
- ok
- fetched_at
- 2026-06-09 15:37:30